 Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
| ||||
Optional: write a lede — not necessarily a WP:LEAD. Interesting > encyclopedic.
According to Wales, the article Gaza genocide "inappropriately, and contrary to our policy and traditions, takes sides in an ongoing controversy when it ought to accurately and fairly summarize all relevant views."
summary
summary
Sed ut perspiciatis, unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam eaque ipsa, quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt, explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem, quia voluptas sit, aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos, qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt, neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum, quia dolor sit amet consectetur adipisci velit.
The Grokipedia media was overwhelming in the period since the last issue. Here's just a sampling.
Speculative fiction author John Scalzi wrote about his test of the new contender, and had some issues with it repeating rumors about film adaptations by Steven Spielberg and other things. His summary was:
[I]f you have to choose a "pedia" to trust, you might choose the one assembled by a bunch of pedantic nerds saying "well, ACTUALLY" to each other until the heat death of the universe, over the one assembled by an LLM controlled by an insecure Nazi salute-throwing billionaire who sprints to reprogram that LLM every time it shares a fact that makes that billionaire angry or sad, or doesn't fit into his Playskool Machiavellian ambitions and plans. In this particular case, a thousand pedantic nerds is much better than a single rich one.
— John Scalzi's "Whatever" blog, "A Review of Grokipedia, Using Myself as Test Subject"
Some reviewers like Robert H. Knight, mentioned above, apparently loved Grokipedia, whereas some others like 404 Media, didn't. The latter called it "the Antithesis of Everything That Makes Wikipedia Good, Useful, and Human". An opinion published in Financial Times said it was "an AI-powered, low-quality, barely readable Wikipedia rip-off with a peculiar penchant for Musk and his worldview", and the editor creating the headline said it was a "major own goal".
A few media found humor in the situation, including McSweeney's Internet Tendency who wrote "Hi, it's me, Wikipedia, and I am ready for your apology", summarized by the quote in fictional Wiki-voice, "peer review deez nutz". The Babylon Bee got into the humor of the binary either/or "winner" mentality with "Can you spot the differences between these Grokipedia and Wikipedia articles?" The Onion had a characteristically straight-faced take that "users report many articles are seemingly adapted straight from Wikipedia" (also noted by Plagiarism Today, but in a not-so-funny way).
This page is a draft for the next issue of the Signpost. Below is some helpful code that will help you write and format a Signpost draft. If it's blank, you can fill out a template by copy-pasting this in and pressing 'publish changes': {{subst:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}}
Images and Galleries
|
|---|
To put an image in your article, use the following template (link):  I understand the primacy of pure feeling in creative art. This will create the file on the right. Keep the 300px in most cases. If writing a 'full width' article, change
Placing (link) will instead create an inline image like below  The significant thing is feeling, as such, quite apart from the environment in which it is called forth.
To create a gallery, use the following Each line inside the tags should be formatted like
If you want it centered, remove t |
Quotes
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To insert a framed quote like the one on the right, use this template (link): If writing a 'full width' article, change
To insert a pull quote like
use this template (link):
To insert a long inline quote like
use this template (link): | ||||||
Side frames
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Side frames help put content in sidebar vignettes. For instance, this one (link): gives the frame on the right. This is useful when you want to insert non-standard images, quotes, graphs, and the like.
A caption
For example, to insert the {{Graph:Chart}} generated by in a frame, simple put the graph code in to get the framed Graph:Chart on the right. If writing a 'full width' article, change |
Two-column vs full width styles
|
|---|
|
If you keep the 'normal' preloaded draft and work from there, you will be using the two-column style. This is perfectly fine in most cases and you don't need to do anything. However, every time you have a However, you can also fine-tune which style is used at which point in an article. To switch from two-column → full width style midway in an article, insert where you want the switch to happen. To switch from full width → two-column style midway in an article, insert where you want the switch to happen. |
Links and such
|
|---|
By the way, the template that you're reading right now is {{Editnotices/Group/Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue}} (edit). A list of the preload templates for Signpost articles can be found here. |
.jpg)
Discuss this story