The Signpost
WP:POST/N
Newsroom


Welcome to the central hub of The Signpost!

This is The Signpost Newsroom, a place where The Signpost team can coordinate with writers, both regular and occasional, and people who have suggestions for topics to cover. See the boxes below if you have suggestions (something for the team to write about in regular columns), proposal/submissions (for articles you want to write/have written yourself), or want to create a pre-formatted draft article in your userspace, with helpful links and easy-to-edit syntax. Discussion occurs both here and in the Signpost Discord.

Discussion of upcoming issues is done at the newsroom talk page. For general feedback on The Signpost as a whole, go to our talk page. To learn more about The Signpost, see our about page.

The Signpost currently has 5883 articles, 730 issues, and 14481 pages (4769 talk and 9712 non-talk).

Links:


Calendar: current deadline is highlighted, and current UTC date is 2026-07-23 01:09:15.
June 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 01 02 03 04 05
July 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
29 30 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 01 02
August 2026
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
27 28 29 30 31 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 01 02 03 04 05 06

Article status

[edit]

Below here is an automatically generated master list of every page whose title starts with Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/. It's automatically generated by SDZeroBot every day. Also consult the mockup page for the next issue to make sure all of their titles, images and blurbs are correct.

You should click the button to manually update it and make sure it's current before doing anything serious.

Show all TKTKs in next issue


Update newsroom tasks

Also, these categories (Purge):

Ready for copyedit Copyedit done Final approval Cat #
no no no Signpost drafts, not ready for copyedit 56
yes no no Signpost drafts, ready for copyedit 3
yes yes no Signpost drafts, ready for final check 11
yes yes yes Signpost drafts, ready for publication 23

From the editor

Not started ·
Resources


Arbitration report

Not started ·
Resources


Comix

Not started ·
Resources· next-next issue draft· staging area


Cobwebs

Not started ·
Resources


Crossword

Not started ·
Resources· staging area


Disinformation report

Not started ·
Resources


Discussion report

Not started ·
Resources· next-next issue draft


Not started ·
Resources

Just noting for the sake of my fellow contributors that I plan to use this slot for the upcoming issue. I'll draft something up offline and post it here if I get it ready in time. QuicoleJR (talk|edits) 18:37, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not started ·
Resources


From the archives

Not started ·
Resources


Next from the archives

Not started ·
Resources


Not started ·
Resources


Humour

Not started ·
Resources


Essay

Not started ·
Resources


Concept

Not started ·
Resources


Crossword

Not started ·
Resources· staging area


In the media

In progress · 4,759b
last edited 2026-07-20 22:09:37 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

Wil540 art (talk) 02:06, 19 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wil540 art (talk) 17:57, 22 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

News and notes

In progress · 3,238b
last edited 2026-07-22 18:17:59 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


News from Diff

Not started ·
Resources


Obituary

Not started ·
Resources


Op-ed

Not started ·
Resources


Opinion

Not started ·
Resources


Recent research

Not started ·
Resources

An article from the Jewish News Syndicate was written about this publication from the University of Haifa.

Drawing on in-depth interviews with 19 Jewish veteran editors of the English Wikipedia, this study outlines a four-phase model of editorial engagement: idealistic entry, emergent friction, emotional erosion, and adaptive coping or emerging silences.

— Lir, 2026

I found the JNS article link on the "In the media" draft page, but I think a academic analysis of this is warranted.

It does include references to several sources considered marginally reliable or generally unreliable on WP:RS/P, such as the Anti Defamation League (WP:ADLAS) and Pirate Wires (WP:PIRATEWIRES), though considering that this article is centred around the Wikipedia community, I think deferring judgement to the community compiled list should be avoided. Mitchsavl (talk) 10:13, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the paper is here. I don't really understand what you mean by "I think deferring judgement to the community compiled list should be avoided."
There is something that has to be said about the academic article. It is absolutely one-sided, in the sense that no Palestinian or Arab editors are interviewed. It might even be implied by the paper (or just inferred by this reader) that the author thinks the Palestinian/Arab/Muslim side is not worth considering. Stating this outright, the idea might be "How could Palestinians/Arabs/Muslims know anything about anti-Semitism?" Actually, I'd think they would know a lot about discrimination, hate, and even genocide. It could be essentially the same story, just with the ethnic/religious labels switched. In short, if we're not careful we could be stepping in some deep shit here. Let User:HaeB decide, maybe with the help of User:Bri and User:Piotrus and others. Smallbones(smalltalk) 14:51, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
forgot to ping @Mitchsavl: Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:24, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
About "deferring judgement should be avoided": I think the op meant that the deprecated sources list should not be applied in this case. If followed blindly, it could lead to a sort of trapdoor where any critique of the community's decision-making process would be off limits to consider in order to re-evaluate the community's decision-making process. I'm not sure I follow it to that conclusion, but I do appreciate the thought that we should be extra receptive to criticism in our internal discussions, especially when coming from an academic source. To put it bluntly, I don't think WP:RSPS was ever intended to be prescriptive in terms of winnowing what we choose to present in the Recent research column. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have never been active in the modern Isreali politics, and I am trying my best to avoid historical too. I fully agree with the 4-step trajectory described, but if the article tries to argue it affects only Isreali editors, it's obviously is quite biased (and frankly that pattern can be generalized to most contentious topics). So in essence the research is finding that "some editors burned out after editing a contentious area for some time". Riiiight. News. Let's move on to the next paper about "Wikipedia articles about US politics can be edited by anyone", "Fooian propaganda actors are trying to edit Wikipedia" or "Zooian companies are spamming Wikipedia". Sigh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Serendipity

Not started ·
Resources


Technology report

Not started ·
Resources


Tips and tricks

Not started ·
Resources


Traffic report

In progress · 18,680b
last edited 2026-07-21 16:16:05 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


WikiProject report

In progress · 2,594b
last edited 2026-07-22 19:20:40 by Chorchapu
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


On the bright side

Not started ·
Resources


Community view

Not started ·
Resources


Forum

Not started ·
Resources


In focus

In progress · 23,360b
last edited 2026-07-13 16:30:48 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Special report

Not started ·
Resources


Interview

Not started ·
Resources


Update the table now
This table is generated by querying the database replica and is periodically updated by a bot.
Edits made within the table area will be removed on the next update!

In focus/Fact checking

In progress · 9,014b
last edited 2026-07-11 14:39:11 by Bri
Resources

Checklist

  • Red X symbolN Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one




∑ 1 items | Query runtime: 0.04 s | Last updated: 16:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

End of auto-generated report.



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0