Archive 30Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36

Suggestion by PAC2 (2024-05-16)

The Signpost should write about... Categories of created articles.

Last year, I published an article about a set of tools to analyse the list of articles created by a user. I've just developed a new tool which analyses all categories associated to the list of articles created by a user.

PAC2 (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion for Crossword by Andrybak (2024-07-27)

Re: 10 down in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-07-22/Crossword, may I suggest incorporating Greater ani (deliberately hidden) into the crossword? Or perhaps it was already used in one of the previous issues? Found in (spoiler alert) an archived discussion. —⁠andrybak (talk) 15:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Shadestar474 (2024-07-28)

The Signpost should write about... the Wikipedia article about Wikipedia and how technically that whole article goes against WP:COI because everyone who has ever contributed to that article has a COI with Wikipedia. That would be an interesting Humour article!

Shadestar474 (talk) 01:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

@Shadestar474: I already had something like this noted down as a potential draft. On the Wikipedia talk page, you can see that an AfD is ran on some April Fools' Day with this logic. Is your suggestion for someone else to write it, or would you like to collaborate on it? (Humour is not my strong suit.) Svampesky (talk) 23:59, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I’m not very good at humour, either, so I was thinking that maybe one of the more experienced humour writers could write it? Shadestar474 (talk) 09:04, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, we have some experienced writers, and some humour writers, but I'm not sure we have any experienced humour writers. April 1 is an especially difficult time to write humour. Smallbones(smalltalk) 22:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
We should probably just get one of the humour writers to write it, then? Shadestar474 (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Shushugah (2024-09-04)

The Signpost should write about... Internet Archive has lost its appeal in Hachette v. Internet Archive, the long-running, closely watched copyright case over the scanning and lending of print library books

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 23:13, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Ham II (2024-09-17)

The Signpost should write about... criticism by the historian Simon Sebag Montefiore of changes made to the lead section of the article Zionism between 2023 and now: https://x.com/simonmontefiore/status/1836032108105490799?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw. "History needs to be balanced & authoritative, based on facts and knowledge. Its replacement here @wikipedia by prejudiced ideology, distorted facts, and ahistorical fakery is alarming . @wikipedia is (was) respected & important because it presents facts & history without bias. Sometimes there were duels on pages between historical schools of thoughts but ultimately its editors wished to present history based on facts and balance. Has this page been captured by activists? It looks like it has. If so dear @wikipedia come back: You are part of the wider underpinnings of truth, authoritative history and factbased reportage that we desperately need in our society to foster the trust in information, reporting and scholarship, and the respect for learning and evidence that we need for our democracies to work. These principles are under attack in our academies, our media and of course in social media. @wikipedia has with a few exceptions been rare sanctuary of standards. We need you. Plse restore those all important principles"

This was in a quote tweet of a post which may have gone viral yesterday; at any rate the original post seems to have sparked Twitter activity reported on at https://www.israelhayom.com/2024/09/17/wikipedia-entry-now-calls-zionism-colonialism/ and https://www.jns.org/wikipedia-defines-zionism-as-colonialism-sparking-outrage/. (Those two webpages are essentially the same article.) At Talk:Zionism § Bat Signal a user notes that "page views for this article more than doubled from the average yesterday". Ham II (talk) 19:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Robertsky (2024-09-09)

The Signpost should write about... Asian News International court case against Wikimedia Foundation. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/delhi-hc-warns-wikipedia-over-ani-defamation-case-issues-contempt-notice-11725517336837.html in the next In the news report.

A draft: India's Asian News International (ANI) has brought Wikimedia Foundation to the courts over what they alleged to be defamatory content on the article about themselves, which currently stated that they "[had] been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions." Wikimedia Foundation is being compelled by the courts to give personal information of some editors who have edited the article. ANI as a source was determined in 2021 RfC that for general reporting, it is between marginally reliable and generally unreliable; it should be attributed in-text for contentious claims; and generally unreliable and questionable for its coverage of domestic and international politics, and other topics that the Government of India has a stake due to reported dissemination of pro-government propaganda. (WP:RSPANI)

– robertsky (talk) 08:38, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, added it to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/In the media, with a link to our earlier coverage in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-07-22/In the media.
Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Novem Linguae (2024-09-10)

The Signpost should write about... Wikipedia:Administrator elections. These are right around the corner (October) and will be a big change for enwiki. You can find a summary of some important details at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/MMS/Election schedule. This probably doesn't need a whole article, but would be good to mention somewhere. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:23, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

@Novem Linguae Thank you for suggesting this: it will feature in one of the lead stories on "News and notes", courtesy of @Soni! : ) Oltrepier (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by SYSS Mouse (2024-09-16)

The Signpost should write about... South China Morning Post wrote this piece "Wikipedia bans user for ‘alleged trolling, doxxing and intimidation’ of Hong Kong journalists"

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3278559/wikipedia-bans-user-alleged-trolling-doxxing-and-intimidation-hong-kong-journalists

Cross referencing Global ban list confirms the user is Flamelai (blocked here locally in July 2023 under WP:NOTHERE)

SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:33, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

See also n:Chinese Wikimedian banned amidst largest ‘harassment’ campaign against Hong Kong journalist (draft by User:Cypp0847). Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
@SYSS Mouse Thank you for suggesting this! A short piece about the global ban will feature in the "News and notes" section of the upcoming issue, so watch out for it! Oltrepier (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2024-09-18)

The Signpost should write about... Seems something is happening at the Azerbaijani Wikipedia [1] (OC Media). Related discussions at [2][3]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång Thank you for suggesting this: it will feature in the "In the media" section of the upcoming issue! Oltrepier (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by The Anome (2024-09-19)

Here's a creationist website article asking the question "Is Wikipedia distorted by ideology and propaganda?" https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2024/09/18/is-wikipedia-distorted-by-ideology-and-propaganda/ Amusing, to say the least. — The Anome (talk) 03:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)

Since when is Jerry Coyne a creationist? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2024-10-14)

The Signpost should write about... There is a new WP-article, Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation, you have probably heard of the subject. However, that WP-article has now been mentioned in the court, and not approvingly:[4][5]

Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:07, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

The court hearing is to be held on 25 October. I think we can roll this into that hearing if Signpost isn't released by then. – robertsky (talk) 11:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I correct myself, it seems to be barely within the deadline for the next issue. – robertsky (talk) 11:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
and WP:Office has oversighted it. SYSS Mouse (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Initially for my own interest, I created a series of bar charts to evaluate the link counts Wikipedia's top-level policy pages (as of the first full week of November). I'd like to offer these up if anyone working on the Signpost would like to use them for an article:

Rjjiii (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Hawkeye7 (2024-11-23)

Found this news article frustrating': Aussie Wikipedia editors burn out: New study highlights disagreements, racism, and 'edit wars' Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2024-12-02)

The Signpost should write about... According to this video, c. 16:00-17:00, the WMF have stopped fund-raising in India for the time being. May be worth a mention. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi everyone

when did Snoop Dogg start to become a famous person and how Amogelang22 (talk) 11:47, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, @Amogelang22. This page is for suggesting items to go into Signpost, the Wikipedia internal newsletter, so it is usually only about matters involving Wikipedia or its associated sites, or the Wikimedia Foundation, not general knowledge.
For general questions, the Reference Desk is the place to ask; but I think your questions are answered at Snoop Dogg. ColinFine (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by Bogazicili (2024-12-08)

The Signpost should write about...

In addition to Wikipedia's Indian problem: Settler colonial erasure of native American knowledge and history on the world's largest encyclopedia study, there's a recent study about Australia-related articles that found problematic coverage of Indigenous topics:

To engage with place in the Australian context is inevitably an engagement with settler-colonialism. This research concludes that First Nations histories, current experiences and voices remain marginalised on Wikipedia, reflecting the literature (Thorpe, Sentance & Booker 2023; Gallert et al. 2016; Bjork-James 2021). There are other omissions as well. Lucas argued that “basically any non-white experiences or non-dominant experiences are omitted.” Gabriel felt that Wikipedia was “quite a hostile space to marginalised people” and that there is “a really frustrating lack of space, I suppose, to me in all three elements: being a regional Australian; being queer; being disabled. None of them feel like something that Wikipedia really quite welcomes a lot of the time.”

[6][7]

The previous journal article was covered in the Signpost (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-10-19/Recent research) and there was also a response to it (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2024-06-08/Opinion). Can we also mention the most recent study in one of the upcoming Signpost issues? Bogazicili (talk) 14:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge

I would like to see a brief monthly note in The Signpost about the c:Commons:Photo challenge themes. It could probably be a simple, standardized blurb, e.g., The c:Commons:Photo challenge for December 2024 is to upload photos you have taken of pastel colors and footprints. Photos must be taken by the uploader. Vote for your favorites from last month's challenge.

WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Suggestion by David Eppstein (2024-12-20)

One for your listing of recent Wikipedia-related publications:

Eppstein, D.; Lewis, J. B.; Woodroofe, Russ; XOR'easter (2025). "Princ-wiki-a mathematica: Wikipedia editing and mathematics" (PDF). Notices of the AMS. 72 (1): 65–73..

David Eppstein (talk) 18:55, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

@David Eppstein Thank you for your submission!
I guess @HaeB might find this pretty interesting for his "Recent research" column... Oltrepier (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Already appeared in the last issue, thanks. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
{{done}} Eddie891 Talk Work 06:34, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Kosboot (2024-12-23)

The Signpost should write about... The 138th annual meeting of the American Historical Association is meeting in New York City and features a panel discussion on the topic Open Knowledge as Pedagogical Praxis: How Faculty and Students Are Opening up the Field of History by Improving Wikipedia. (This session is in-person only and meets Saturday morning, January 4 at 10:30-12 pm.) - kosboot (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC) kosboot (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

@Kosboot Done, thank you for flagging it! Oltrepier (talk) 13:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Ahri Boy (2025-01-03)

The Signpost should write about... Possible total project capture of the Hebrew Wikipedia. See the RFC page at Meta. I saw a lot of HEWP users complaining about ongoing unfair treatment of the people, including mass blocks on the users that current admins don't agree with their viewpoint.

Ahri Boy (talk) 16:43, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ahri Boy It's likely too late to feature this, but we'll look into it for the next issue! Oltrepier (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2025-01-06)

The Signpost should write about... Wikipedia’s Lies Against Israel and How to Protect Historical Truth, YT-video by/with one Aaron Bandler. At the time of writing, I haven't seen it, 1h+, but the guy is a journalist. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

And another thing: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Heritage_Foundation_intending_to_"identify_and_target"_editors. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

@Gråbergs Gråa Sång The VP discussion will feature in the lead story on In The Media. Thank you for flagging these! Oltrepier (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Chetsford (2025-03-21)

I don't want to brag / self-promote, but I got recognized for my "extra stupid" [sic] RfC close in this newspaper or magazine or something [8]. Several other editors are also mentioned! Chetsford (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

{{done}} I placed this in In the media before I saw this request. See issue 5. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Pyb en résidence (2025-03-22)

The Signpost should write about... the release of Ziyad Alsufyani from jail. Unfortunately Osama Khalid remains in prison. Source: https://x.com/ALQST_En/status/1899417275733574124

Pyb en résidence (talk) 20:08, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by JMF (2025-04-07)

The Signpost should write about...

Ongoing collaborations

If there's a round-up of ongoing online collaborations, there's the 420 Collaboration and the Philodendron Garden Party, which lasts until the end of May. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:12, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Maile66 (2025-01-20)

Request a poll re external plagiarism. How many times have you noticed your work on Wikipedia has been lifted verbatim and published elsewhere under another name?

I think it would be an interesting response from long-time editors. Happens to me a lot, which maybe says I did a good job if someone wants to steal it. My most recent was Loyal Valley, Texas. But the most blatant was someone who published a book under their own name from my content they copied verbatim: [9]. — Maile (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Ed Erhart (WMF) (2025-01-21)

Planning for m:Wikipedia 25 is kicking off. Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@JPxG: I'm not sure if you or anyone else has seen this suggestion and the one above it. Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 06:08, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2025-02-09)

"Even Wikipedia recognises the gravity of the situation its contributors in Belarus now face, to the extent that they have overridden their own protocols and deleted the entire edit history for Belarus-related articles that could land its users in trouble." That's interesting. From Novaya Gazeta. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:20, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Ham II (2025-02-10) Suggestion

The Signpost should write about... Jordan Prosser (10 February 2025), "Want to know how the world ends? Try this Wikipedia page", The Guardian. One for In the media (probably the In brief section). Ham II (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Srf123 (2025-02-19)

The Signpost should write about... this news article - Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis

Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Devendra Fadnavis has asked Maharashtra police to remove "derogatory and objectionable references" about Sambhaji in Wikipedia.

Srf123 (talk) 10:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Viriditas (2025-03-01)

There's something odd about the font used to overlay the images on the main Signpost page (within the Signpost/snippet template). I think it's supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek, retro call out or homage to Web 1.0 graphic design, and I get that, but the readability of the font is lacking due to the fat (or bold) typeface. It would help if there was increased legibility in the font. Viriditas (talk) 23:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Lupe (2025-03-03)

The Signpost should write about... the Museum of all Things. Someone mentioned it in the German Signpost equivalent and someone should do so here as well! So far it only has an English version anyways.

Lupe (talk) 10:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Gråbergs Gråa Sång (2025-03-10)

The Signpost should write about...

Kjersti Flaa broke through the WP:N wall, mainly by being BLP2E. At least an editor currently blocked thought so[10], but personally I agree. Flaa has been vaguely connected to something WP calls It Ends with Us controversy (no, I never heard about that either). She made a YT-video about being on WP[11] which has 3 628 comments atm, and the WP-article about her has been mentioned in Verdens Gang:[12] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Relativity (2025-03-24)

The Signpost should write about... something along the lines of a thank you to the WMF/Jimbo for keeping Wikipedia safe and free.

Relativity ⚡️ 01:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Suggestion by Another Believer (2025-03-04)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Signpost should write about:

Nice to see appreciation for Wikipedia's coverage of restaurants!

--Another Believer (Talk) 20:16, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion by Seefooddiet (2025-03-19)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Signpost should write about... [13] Shameless self-plug about an article in The Korea Times about me and a bunch of Wikipedia articles I wrote in the List of oldest restaurants in South Korea. Think suited for the "In brief" section of "In the media".

Could use this as a base (it's really boring because I'm boring, feel free to spice it up).

seefooddiet (talk) 00:34, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

@Seefooddiet By the way, I requested this above! Good stuff ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:46, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
oop just spotted, thanks :) seefooddiet (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
@Seefooddiet @Another Believer Although it's been a while, I'm happy to let you know we're including a short blurb about your interview in the ITM column for the upcoming issue. Well done! Oltrepier (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion by Feed Me Your Skin (2025-04-10)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Signpost should write about...

I wrote a blogpost where I go over the entire Wikimedia movement and explain how it all works, including (but not limited to) Wikipedia, which I think that it's something that the community would find interesting.

Short draft:

User:Feed_Me_Your_Skin has written an article detailing the entire Wikimedia movement. It goes over the main projects, the software behind the Wikimedia projects, the role of the Wikimedia foundation in managing the movement, and more. To the best of the author's knowledge, this is the most in-depth document that has ever been written about Wikimedia. The author hopes that this article will help spread awareness about the more obscure aspects of Wikimedia and make people more familiar with the other projects. Whether or not you're new to Wikipedia or if you're a seasoned Wikipedian, the author is confident that everybody will find something in this article that they find interesting. To read it, click the following link: [14]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feed Me Your Skin (talkcontribs) 01:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

@Feed Me Your Skin: Thanks for suggesting. Tell me more about what you want to happen next. I will suggest two routine options, but you can also suggest any other idea you have.
  1. The Signpost links to your blog post in the "brief notes" section of the regular "News and Notes" column. See examples at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2025-04-09/News_and_notes]
  2. You apply an open copyright license to your post, and you yourself format it into a "community view" article so that readers can access it in the newspaper itself without clicking through to a link. If you want that option, go to Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom, find "community view", and "start article".
I appreciate the research you did and you making a submission here. Let me know if I can support further. Bluerasberry (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
I'll format it as a community view article, although I'd still like to add a link showing that the article was taken from my blog if that's allowed. Feed Me Your Skin (talk) 01:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
@Feed Me Your Skin: this will keep things tidy, if you don't mind. When you are ready, go to WP:NEWSROOM and scroll down to Community view. Click the blue box that says "create article". That will preload a page with formatting that we need in The Signpost. You can save it and edit it at will up until you feel ready to declare it ready for staff to edit. Thanks! ☆ Bri (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
@Feed Me Your Skin: You have done a great job! Thanks for the submission. It is well formatted and you put wikilinks throughout for people to follow for more information. Bluerasberry (talk) 19:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion by Bruce1ee (2025-03-09)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Signpost should write about xkcd's Wikipedia Omniroll – "a cylindrical food containing one layer of every item from the Wikipedia article List of rolled foods".

Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

+1 2601:2C4:4181:CC0:438:62B1:7D:F6D (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion by Another Believer (2025-04-17)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The Signpost should write about... File:Wikipedians by number of edits (2014-2025).webm. Pretty cool! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

@Another Believer Done! You'll find a short blurb in the N&N column for the next issue.
@Panamitsu Thank you so much for your service! Oltrepier (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
If The Signpost does want to write about the graph, could we wait a bit? I'm currently making a video showing data from 2002 which would be much more interesting, so it'd be better to use that video. I'll let you know once I've finished that one. ―Panamitsu (talk) 23:05, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Another Believer and Oltrepier, I've just updated the video to include data going back to 2002. There are some weird things going on at the beginning, with edit counts decreasing for a bit so I've tried to explain why that happened in the description on Commons. Here is the new video: File:Wikipedians By Number Of Edits (2002-2025).webm. ―Panamitsu (talk) 09:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
By the way, because I downloaded old revisions of the list of Wikipedians by number of edits page to get this data, there were a few pieces of vandalism in the dataset (I tried to avoid this, but once all the data was downloaded and I realised that I didn't do it right, I didn't want to download it again). This meant that at one point one of the top Wikipedians by edit count was "your mom". But I went through and removed the vandalism. ―Panamitsu (talk) 09:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
@Panamitsu Thank you for clarifying, I've just updated the blurb accordingly! Oltrepier (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Maryana Iskander

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Surely there would be plans to cover this without my suggestion, but sharing just in case:

---Another Believer (Talk) 17:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip! I beat your notice by just a few minutes at In the media. We have also started an item at News and notes. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Thumbs up icon ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion by MediaKyle (2025-05-08)

The Signpost should write about...

Harry Bruce, son of Charles Tory Bruce, was a prolific Canadian writer and journalist well-known in Atlantic Canada for his biographical novels and essays. He died nine months ago in August 2024, but somehow never had an article on Wikipedia even after his seven decade career. A little over a week ago I came across his grandson, User:GabrielMABruce, editing articles on my watchlist related to Guysborough County. After extending an invitation to WikiProject Nova Scotia, GabrielMABruce and I talked back and forth on his talk page and he expressed his family's wish to see a Wikipedia article created about his grandfather. We worked together on a draft since then before publishing what we have now. I thought it would be poetic if GabrielMABruce were to write a piece for The Signpost detailing his experience joining Wikipedia to do this, given the fact that he comes from a long line of journalists and this was an explicit goal of the family. GabrielMABruce has expressed interest in doing so, and I thought this would be the best place to start to see if other editors think this is as cool of a story as I do. Thanks, MediaKyle (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, the aforementioned Gabriel here. Thank you to MediaKyle for suggesting this to me! I joined Wikipedia a year ago to try and create an article for my grandfather and improve the existing one for my great-grandfather. Ultimately, confused by aspects of editing and concerned about COI, I gave up shortly after beginning. I came back to Wikipedia editing recently to improve articles relating to Guysborough County. MediaKyle contacted me about getting involved with WikiProject Nova Scotia, and collaborating on an article for Harry. I'm very proud of what we developed, and look forward to continuing my work with MediaKyle to bring it to GA status.
I would be happy to write something about my experience as a new editor, the meaning this endeavor has had to me and my family, and my renewed appreciation for the power of Wikipedia and the people behind it. GabrielMABruce (talk) 04:07, 8 May 2025 (UTC)



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0