As first reported by The Free Press, interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia Ed Martin (who has been nominated by President Donald Trump to serve permanently in that role of DC's top prosecutor) has accused "Wikipedia (of) allowing foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda to the American public." Martin claims that "information received by my Office demonstrates that Wikipedia’s informational management policies benefit foreign powers." These and other serious accusations are contained in a four-page letter sent to "Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. AKA Wikipedia" in Washington, DC on April 24. Martin alleges that the WMF's activities violate IRS rules for 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations, so its tax-exempt status should be removed, and has given the Foundation until May 15 to respond.

Major concerns cited in the article include:

• foreign (non-US) actors spreading propaganda;
• the dominance of non-US citizens on the Board of Trustees;
• accusations from Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger on the non-neutrality of the encyclopedia's content.

Martin's letter to the WMF asks twelve detailed questions, including:

"4. What steps has the Foundation taken to exclude foreign influence operations from making targeted edits to categories of content in order to reshape or rewrite history? Who enforces these measures, and how? What foreign influence operations have been detected, and what did the Foundation do to reverse their influence and prevent it from continuing?"

The Free Press notes that "the letter is unusual, since investigations into charities and their tax-exempt status are typically handled by the IRS." Moreover, Nonprofit Quarterly reported at length on the difficult and lengthy process required by US law to remove a nonprofit's tax-exempt status.

Note that federal law (26 US Code Section 7217) prohibits senior officials of the executive branch, including the president, from requesting that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) conduct or cease an audit or other investigation of any taxpayer (including tax-exempt entities); there is an exception for written requests by the treasury secretary to the IRS as a consequence of the implementation of a change in tax policy. [...] Congress would seemingly have such authority, but, to date, such legislative action has not been publicly contemplated.

The Washington Post covered the Free Press article, writing that Martin's letter "is part of a broader campaign by the Trump administration and its allies, including Martin, against institutions, media outlets and online platforms they have accused of pushing liberal agendas or political views." The newspaper also reached out to Molly White, who viewed the letter as part of the administration's attempts at "weaponizing laws to try to silence high-quality independent information", as well as Wikipedia beat reporter Stephen Harrison, who said that Martin "seems to want an America First version of Wikipedia", rather than a global information source.

An earlier WaPo article reported that Martin had appeared over 150 times as a guest commentator on Russian state-controlled broadcasters RT and Sputnik from August 2016 to April 2024. Among his statements, he had told "an interviewer on the same arm of RT's global network that 'there [was] no evidence' of a Russian military buildup on Ukraine's borders, criticizing U.S. officials as warmongering and ignoring Russia's security concerns," nine days before Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Martin did not declare any of these appearances on a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire for his upcoming confirmation vote or possible confirmation hearing. Several of Martin's appearances on Russian propaganda outlets are shown in another WaPo video.

The Verge also reported on the original Free Press story, while adding that "Martin is known for thinly justified legal threats against media organizations," having recently sent similar letters to various medical journals, including "the New England Journal of Medicine, the CHEST Journal, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, accusing them of being 'partisan in various scientific debates.'"

In addition to her previous comment for WaPo, Molly White told The Signpost that "the biggest harm here is not to Wikimedia, but to the rule of law and to free expression. Letters like this, threatening organizations over clearly First Amendment-protected activities, are a shocking illustration of the authoritarianism that has rapidly blossomed under Trump. I'm proud that Wikipedia continues to prioritize accurate and scientific information as determined by its global volunteer editing community and its policies, not the political propaganda of a single administration looking to impose its views." White published an op-ed on similar topics on the January 15 issue of the Signpost.

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales himself took part in a discussion on the matter at Village pump, while a WMF spokesperson released this statement to the media:

The Wikimedia Foundation is the nonprofit organization that operates Wikipedia, the backbone of knowledge on the internet, and other free knowledge projects. Wikipedia is one of the last places online that shows the promise of the internet, housing more than 65 million articles written to inform, not persuade. Wikipedia's content is governed by three core content policies: neutral point of view, verifiability, and no original research, which exist to ensure information is presented as accurately, fairly, and neutrally as possible. The entire process of content moderation is overseen by nearly 260,000 volunteers and is open and transparent for all to see, which is why we welcome opportunities to explain how Wikipedia works and will do so in the appropriate forum. Our vision is a world in which every single human can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.

– S and O

Gizmodo (link) and The Verge (link) both reported that Wikimedia Enterprise and Google's Kaggle are supplying a dataset from Wikipedia formatted for AI companies. Both outlets cite an announcement from Wikimedia Enterprise (a paid service operated by Wikimedia LLC, the Wikimedia Foundation's for-profit subsidiary) that in turn links to the download page on Kaggle. As of April 17 – the date of Gizmodo's report – it had recorded 186 downloads. Google's Blog also reports the news on the dataset.

Contrary to claims made by both Gizmodo and The Verge, the release of this dataset on Kaggle is not a reaction to the impact of scraping on our infrastructure, nor is it an attempt to “fend off” AI scrapers or “get [them] off our back”, as clarified in a statement by the Wikimedia Foundation.

An earlier version of the same dataset had been published on Hugging Face in September 2024 already. As summarized in the current Enterprise announcement, the dataset consists of structured Wikipedia content in English and French [...d]esigned with machine learning workflows in mind, and includes high-utility elements such as abstracts, short descriptions, infobox-style key-value data, image links, and clearly segmented article sections. It does not include the media files from Wikimedia Commons that the Foundation recently described as the primary target of problematic crawler activity (see last Signpost issue: "Op-ed: How crawlers impact the operations of the Wikimedia projects", "Opinion: Crawlers, hogs and gorillas"). According to an FAQ, Enterprise currently support[s] all text-based Wikimedia projects, but do[es] not currently support Wikidata (besides QIDs) or Wikimedia Commons.

The Signpost covered previous partnerships between the WMF (or Wikimedia projects) and Kaggle back in 2011 and in 2021. – S, H

Indian block?: According to an April 12 article in the Hindustan Times, the Maharashtra Cyber police, after being frustrated with the WMF neither taking down the "objectionable" content on the page on Sambhaji, nor disclosing the editor's identity, have requested the Indian government's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology to block Wikipedia in India. See the original Signpost report on objections to content about historical king Sambhaji. If carried out, this would be the latest incident in a long history of Internet censorship in India.

Supreme Court get its say in ANI vs. Wikimedia: On April 17, Bar and Bench wrote that the Supreme Court of India had set aside a lower court's order to remove "defamatory" edits about Asian News International (ANI) from the agency's Wikipedia page. Times Now also reported on the decision, as did others. We aren't sure what it all means yet, but the case isn't over: Bar and Bench said "[the Supreme] Court granted liberty to ANI to move the single-judge of Delhi High Court again for interim relief."

In asking for the takedown of articles by interpreting critical information as defamation and by even threatening penal action against Wikipedia, judicial actions could unwittingly lead to the stifling of open discussion of entities on the encyclopaedia, thereby acting against the interest of the free flow of information.

In case you need help following the plot of the ANI vs. Wikimedia Foundation case, here's a recap by Business Standard as of April 9.– B

• Crash, or decline?: Stephen Harrison wrote for Slate about how "How Trump's Stock Market Chaos Is Dividing Wikipedia;" most specifically, the article covers the on-wiki debate over the title of "2025 stock market crash" versus "2025 stock market decline," which is (or was) considered more compliant to NPOV by some editors (including this writer). Hint: unless you are a real expert with a successful track record to prove it, don't try to predict the stock market. - S
• Imponderables: Also writing for Slate, Hannah Steinkopf-Frank describes Wikenigma, a wiki documenting open problems founded by British investigator Martin Gardiner in 2016, as the "Wikipedia of the Unknown".
• Jimmy Wales' new book: The Bookseller, MSN, and ThePrint all noted the publication of a new book by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia: his debut work as an author, The Seven Rules of Trust: And Why It Is Today's Most Essential Superpower, is set to be published on October 28 through Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Alleged slant imparted at edit-a-thon: The Washington Free Beacon claims that, at an edit-a-thon hosted by the National Lawyers Guild chapter at Harvard Law, "Law Students Target[ed] the Pages of Firms That Criticized School's Response to Anti-Semitism," and that they also "edited Wikipedia to downplay anti-Semitic activity on college campuses". The Wikipedia articles on the National Lawyers Guild and the Washington Free Beacon identify them as "progressive" and "conservative", respectively.
  In a TikTok video titled "big law firms, Wikipedia, and alt right tabloids….new bingo card?" – which has attracted over 5000 Likes at the time of writing – an editor involved with the edit-a-thon hit back at the Free Beacon, defending the edits made to the law firm articles as based on "court documents and reputable news sources", and objecting to them having been reverted after the Free Beacon article came out.

• A hoe-to list for your next trip: Back in March, The Korea Times covered a Wikipedia page that hosts a list of the oldest active restaurants in South Korea. The creator of the list, Korean-American user seefooddiet, was notably interviewed for the article, and broke down his criteria of inclusion in the list, while highlighting the English Wikipedia's need for more Korea-focused editors.
• Did the Wikipedia created by a bot start a "race to the bottom"?: Ellen Phiddian wrote for the Australian ABC about how lsjbot, an automated article-creating program developed by Sverker Johansson for Wikipedia, helped create a large portion of the article on the Cebuano Wikipedia, the largest version of Wikipedia that isn't English. Johansson himself was interviewed for the piece, together with fellow contributors Irvin Sto. Tomas and Josh Lim.
• Saving history from fire: Pasadena Now reported on the partnership between the WikiLA user group and Pasadena Heritage, which held an edit-a-thon on April 26 "to document and preserve the history of properties and landscapes that were damaged or destroyed by recent wildfires," and most specifically after the Eaton Fire. The event as held at the historic Edmund Blinn House in Pasadena, California.
• Where we going? Pluto!: Back in February (!), the Piedmont-serving section of TGR, Rai's regional news brand, interviewed Italian astrophysicist and Wikipedian Arianna Piccialli as the co-host of the Planetary Science Wiki Edit-a-thon, a yearly edit-a-thon organized by Wikimedia Belgium, Europlanet and the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy to "celebrate and promote diversity within the international planetary science community by highlighting the contributions of women and under-represented groups". This year's edition started on February 18, the anniversary of the discovery of dwarf planet Pluto, and will last until September 13. Among others in multiple languages, the initiative has helped create biographies of Frances Northcutt, Rossella Panarese, and Venetia Burney – who first suggested Pluto's name.