<noinclude>


The Signpost

</noinclude>

Preload

YOUR ARTICLE TITLE

<noinclude>
S
In this issue
Newsroom (all comments)
The Signpost
WP:POST/N
Newsroom


Welcome to the central hub of The Signpost!

This is The Signpost Newsroom, a place where The Signpost team can coordinate with writers, both regular and occasional, and people who have suggestions for topics to cover. See the boxes below if you have suggestions (something for the team to write about in regular columns), proposal/submissions (for articles you want to write/have written yourself), or want to create a pre-formatted draft article in your userspace, with helpful links and easy-to-edit syntax. Discussion occurs both here and in the Signpost Discord.


Discussion of upcoming issues is done at the newsroom talk page. For general feedback on The Signpost as a whole, go to our talk page. To learn more about The Signpost, see our about page.

The Signpost currently has 5624 articles, 704 issues, and 13710 pages (4476 talk and 9234 non-talk).

Links:

Suggest a topic

To suggest a topic to be covered by The Signpost, simply click on the button below or post to our suggestions page manually. Example of good topics are

  • Editors who have done something extraordinary/wonderful
  • Ongoing discussions
  • Media coverage of Wikipedia
  • Technical news
  • Updates to important tools and templates
  • Wikipedia-related events

but many more exist.


Email a private tip to the EiC
Propose/submit an article

If you have an idea for an article you would like to write, you can submit it for review by the editorial team. You can do so by clicking the button below or by posting to our submissions page manually.

  • News articles should be kept relatively neutral and report on a specific piece of actual news. They can be on any topic of interest to Wikipedians, from general events, to technical news.
  • Opinion pieces are evaluate on originality, relevance to Wikipedians, and the quality of the arguments. They should provoke thought and encourage productive discussion.
  • Special pieces cover things that don't fall neatly in the above two categories. If it's interesting to you, it's likely interesting to someone else as well. Check with us and we'll see what can be done!

Create a draft

To create a draft of an article in your userspace, simply copy-paste {{subst:Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/Story-preload}} at Special:MyPage/Signpost draft (replacing USERNAME with your own username).

You can also use the button below. This will preload a form, which you can then save and edit. We recommend saving without making any edits to the preloaded form before starting to write your article.



Calendar: current deadline is highlighted, and current UTC date is 2024-12-22 06:36:13.
November 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
28 29 30 31 01 02 03
04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 01
December 2024
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
25 26 27 28 29 30 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 01 02 03 04 05
January 2025
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
30 31 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 01 02

Article status

Below here is an automatically generated master list of every page whose title starts with Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/. It's automatically generated by SDZeroBot every day. Also consult the mockup page for the next issue to make sure all of their titles, images and blurbs are correct.

You should click the button to manually update it and make sure it's current before doing anything serious.

Note: There are also a bunch of things in /Drafts and /Next next issue. When prepping an issue, make sure that articles in this expand-o-box are accounted for.

Sometimes titles will get messed up; check these too.

Also, these categories (Purge):

Ready for copyedit Copyedit done Final approval Cat #
no no no Signpost drafts, not ready for copyedit 42
yes no no Signpost drafts, ready for copyedit 5
yes yes no Signpost drafts, ready for final check 4
yes yes yes Signpost drafts, ready for publication 1

From the editor

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Arbitration report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Comix

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Cobwebs

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Disinformation report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Discussion report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


From the archives

In progress · 5,538b
last edited 2024-12-21 19:39:48 by Smallbones
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


Next from the archives

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


In progress · 10,515b
last edited 2024-12-21 20:53:04 by Bri
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

Since my name isn't in the byline, I'd suggest incorporating some images that aren't wintry, especially considering one of the guest writers for this issue is Australian. Commons has a category with plenty of options to choose from: c:Category:Nellie Murrell Collection Christmas/New Year greeting cards and postcards. Svampesky (talk) 20:16, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in a second Australian card (They're right below the "Religious carols" heading). The problem is that Australian cards are pretty typical and many are wintry. No shrimp on the barbie. There are more ships in the Australian collection, though I have no idea why. Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:00, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Humour

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources

I have an idea for something and will have it posted before the deadline. It's Christmas-themed. Svampesky (talk) 20:33, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Essay

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Concept

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Crossword

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


In the media

In progress · 17,524b
last edited 2024-12-21 22:25:50 by Bri
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


News and notes

In progress · 6,750b
last edited 2024-12-21 22:20:04 by Bri
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Blue question mark? Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


News from Diff

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Obituary

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Op-Ed

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources

Reserved for a guest writer. Svampesky (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion

In progress · 14,190b
last edited 2024-12-21 10:29:28 by Graham87
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Green checkmarkY Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

As per the email invitation by Svampesky, I've put together a draft debriefing about my recent RFA at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Opinion. I for one am fairly happy with it for now, but I'll probably be making little tweaks to it until publication. As for the accompanying image, I can't really have an opinion on that ... there is the image on my user page plus File:Graham at the piano, Siegfrieds Mechanisches Musikkabinett, Rüdesheim.jpg ... or we can use something else. I hope this message is in the right place. Graham87 (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the submission, Graham87. I'll sort out the formatting. Svampesky (talk) 18:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent research

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Serendipity

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Technology report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Tips and tricks

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Traffic report

In progress · 18,486b
last edited 2024-12-17 17:07:16 by Vestrian24Bio
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Red X symbolN Subheading
  • Red X symbolN Ready for copyedit
  • Red X symbolN Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
No talk page section · click here to open one


WikiProject report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Community view

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Forum

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


In focus

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Special report

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


Interview

Not started ·
Content guidance + resources


This table is generated by querying the database replica and is periodically updated by a bot.
Edits made within the table area will be removed on the next update!

Newsletters

In progress · 6,425b
last edited 2024-12-21 22:08:26 by Svampesky
Content guidance + resources

Checklist

  • Green checkmarkY Headline
  • Green checkmarkY Subheading
  • Green checkmarkY Copyedit done
  • Red X symbolN Final approval by editor-in-chief
Discussion

The inclusion of newsletters will be a valuable addition to The Signpost. They will promote the creation of newsletters and allow readers to discover parts of Wikipedia they may not have been aware of previously. They should be sorted from earliest publication date at the top. Some newsletters don't have dedicated pages, so section translcusion can be done with {{#section-h:PAGENAME|SECTION}}, if anyone wasn't aware how to do it. I collected the newsletters from Template:Newsletters, but some are not listed in the template. I've also wrapped <nowiki> tags in the newsletters that haven't been published yet. Svampesky (talk) 17:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Svampesky That's such a nice idea! Wouldn't readers be at risk of being a bit intimidated by that wall of information, though? Oltrepier (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Svampesky and Oltrepier: I guess I don't understand the proposal. Is it this: somebody goes to a few of the newsletters and then creates a newsletter article in The Signpost by doing a section transclusion? What else? What do we expect that will do for our readers? Before checking out the newsletter template, my feeling was that most of the newsletters are either defunct or only sporadically published. After checking, it looks like there are other problems as well. Some are poorly written or badly translated, and our readers will end up thinking "what was that nonsense all about?" I still feel that way if all we do is transclude. It would not be fair to our readers and sister publications to just pick something at random and post it here. So how can we do something with those newletters in a way that both their writers and our readers will feel is a quality effort? Smallbones(smalltalk) 01:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Svampesky and Oltrepier: ok, not fully understanding the proposal, I didn't want to impose a structure on it that I think would work. Here goes though, I do think something is possible with it.
  • A regular editor, or somebody who commits to publishing an "Across the movement" (or whatever) article once every 1-2 months, takes charge of it, selects specific reports, writes a couple of 1-2 paragraph intros, and then copies the newsletter reports over to the story and copy edits their text(!). That could work. Include a story from the GLAM or Military History newsletters at first to get people started reading it. Just make sure that readers don't run into a "what the heck" moment. It could work well if somebody is committed to getting it done. Other suggestions on how this might work are welcome. Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Smallbones That's a good point, considering that not all projects have the depth and the top-notch organization of, let's say, Women in Red and WikiProject Medicine...
Your idea sounds quite promising! I'm not involved in a lot of key projects, unfortunately, but I'm sure there's someone who's more familiar with them and very much willing to report the news on a regular basis, apart from @Svampesky himself. Oltrepier (talk) 17:55, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Smallbones and @Oltrepier for the feedback. The idea is for it to serve as a bulletin board for WikiProjects, this is a common feature in newspapers. Svampesky (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
my feeling was that most of the newsletters are either defunct or only sporadically published. In the upcoming issue, the idea is to only include newsletters published in December 2024. Svampesky (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Personally I don't feel that subscribing to the Signpost should become a defacto subscription to every newsletter published by every WikiProject. isaacl (talk) 19:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Isaacl I don't think that was Svampesky's plan, to be honest: it could just be a nice way to catch up with the latest updates from the most structured and important projects. Oltrepier (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I just think that's the net effect. While I appreciate that might be of interest to some, I think there's a significant risk that many readers will think they don't need to subscribe to any specific newsletter any more, and yet ignore most of the newsletter section in the Signpost, thus decreasing the reach of the newsletters. I think a roundup of WikiProject news to help remind people of their existence might encourage more people to participate in them. isaacl (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now that we've discussed the proposal, which seems to be (paraphrasing) a condensed version of some projects' newsletters. Are we re-inventing the wheel here? Isn't this the kind of material that is often in the Discussion report? Here's a link to the relevant content guidance for cross reference. Couldn't whoever wants to do this, just start doing it under that title? ☆ Bri (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a hatnote to each newsletter so readers can subscribe to each of them. Svampesky (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]



∑ 1 items  | Query runtime: 0.02 s | Last updated: 01:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

End of auto-generated report.
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
No comments yet. Yours could be the first!




</noinclude>




       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0