The Signpost

File:Magnifying glass with focus on paper.png
Niabot
CC BY-SA 3.0
117
0
534
News and notes

WMF to kick off new-CEO quest as Iskander preps to move on — Supreme Court nixes gag of Wiki page for other India court row on ANI — code-heads give fix-up date for Charts in lieu of long-dead Graph gizmo

Contribute   —  
Share this
By Bri, Jayen466, and Smallbones

In two May 6 announcements to the community Maryana Iskander announced that in January she is planning to step down as Wikimedia Foundation CEO. Iskander reached out to The Signpost requesting an interview the same day.

See the position announcement here.

The CEO succession planning started more than a year ago and the announcements show a sense of confidence that Iskander is still on the job and will handle the transition in the most effective and professional way.

So we shouldn't expect a usual WMF CEO transition? Iskander just firmly replied that there wouldn't be any surprises.

Iskander officially joined the WMF in January 2022 after a two month long listening tour. She pointed to her 2022 article in diff as the starting point of her priorities as CEO. These included:

She listed some of the major accomplishments since then as:

Have we really gained more public trust? She recognizes that the last six months have been difficult for many Wikimedians in terms of politics, and watching legal and other government actions that target Wikipedia. And there are parts of the media that are very critical in their reporting about us. But she believes that the community and the WMF are strong enough to deal with these challenges.

Iskander tells us that her only immediate plans are to continue contributing to the WMF and the community, and to successfully complete the transition by January.

Her management philosophy is influenced by the book The Starfish and the Spider. The starfish in the title refers to the starfish's ability to regrow a limb if it loses one. She doesn't want to do a "debriefing" or a review of her WMF tenure now because it's still incomplete. We will continue to check in with her over the next eight months and report any major news here. We may even do that "debriefing" around the New Year. (Send in your questions!)

We wish Iskander success in completing the transition and in her future endeavors.

Thanks Maryana! – S

See related coverage in this issue's In the media

White Paper on privacy best practices

The Wikimedia Foundation has published a draft White Paper on the subject of best practices around privacy in Wikimedia-related research. The creation of such a paper was requested by the Arbitration Committee in 2023, to convey "to researchers the principles of our movement and give specific recommendation for researchers on how to study and write about Wikipedians and their personal information in a way that respects our principles." (Phabricator task.)

Volunteers are invited to provide feedback on the current draft by 1 July 2025. See meta:Research:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper#How to provide feedback on the latest version of the privacy white paper (until 1 July 2025) and meta:Research talk:Wikimedia Research Best Practices Around Privacy Whitepaper. AK

Supreme Court of India allows article un-blanking

The Wikimedia Foundation office action that blanked the article Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation has been reversed, after a decision by the Supreme Court of India to overturn a lower court who had ordered removal of content it deemed "defamatory" from Wikipedia. See prior Signpost coverage and this issue's In the media. – B

Charts incoming

The MediaWiki graph extension has been broken and disabled since early 2023 (see prior Signpost coverage at the one year mark), but an announcement on Village pump (technical) states that they will be re-enabled soon. As part of the pilot program the Charts extension has been working on Italian, Swedish, and Hebrew Wikipedias, as well as on MediaWiki.org. It is currently expected that Charts will be enabled on enWiki around 20 May to 22 May.

WMF Bulletin

The WMF's 2025/8 Foundation Bulletin features a draft 2025–26 Annual Plan, as well as Wikimania 2025 location selection, WikiForHumanRights, updates on annual goals in various categories (Knowledge Equity, Safety & Integrity, Effectiveness) and more. There's also a link to the Annual Reports for both the WMF and its Endowment (here and here, respectively).

Brief notes

Signpost
In this issue
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

I have a revolutionary idea. Why not hire a CEO for the Wikimedia Foundation who is an experienced editor on Wikipedia? Smallchief (talk) 22:14, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting... All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Agreed. I made a potential suggestion and was shot down like a passenger pigeon, and told I was "cruel" for even saying so. Beware the hive mind. Viriditas (talk) 00:06, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They don't care about Wikipedians. Their T&S doesn't work, they are not interested in it working. They are mainly interested in transferring 100 million dollars of wiki donations to aside organization and also they are interested in their expensive celebrations around the world when they praise each other for not caring about Wikipedians. Lyalya Tretikov, the preceder to Iskander, was very much interested in implementing ads in Wikipedia to earn big money. That's what they really think about. --ssr (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Lila Tretikov preceded Katherine Maher, not Maryana Iskander. Mz7 (talk) 20:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Preceded" doesn't necessarily mean the very next preceder. It doesn't matter in this context how many people were in between. --ssr (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On the other hand, using the definite article in "the predecessor" generally does (in English) mean the immediate predecessor. Anomie 11:04, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, {{citation needed}} on the claim that Tretikov tried to get ads on Wikipedia. Not sure I was aware of that before now. Mz7 (talk) 20:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ask. Amir Aharoni told me so. --ssr (talk) 05:05, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are you aware that "WMF staffers widely attribute a series of high-profile employee departures from the WMF to issues with Tretikov's leadership"? Maybe you also unaware of that both Tretikov, and J. Wales, were both caught on plain lies? Citation needed? Here it is. --ssr (talk) 05:34, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where do these Signpost articles mention advertising?
And you might want to ping User:Amire80 directly if you attribute such claims to him.
(Perhaps there is some confusion with the Wikimedia Foundation's efforts to monetize particular forms of access to the community's content, via its for-profit subsidiary Wikimedia LLC. But that was not started under Tretikov, although she did launch efforts that were similarly driven by concerns about tech giants "borrow[ing] information from Wikipedia".)
Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not remember his username because he was talking in a Telegram chat under Telegram account. There are things that do not involve Wikipedia usernames and talk spaces. The abovementioned Signpost articles clearly show us that there are things in WMF staff that are kept top secret. So you may be unaware of something. Or may not. --ssr (talk) 06:00, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tech companies risk ridicule when they hire a revolving door of CEOs who know nothing about tech. That's more or less what the WMF has done. Now, I'd be hesitant to put a power user up there even if they have an offwiki resume that would be worth consideration. There should be some degree of separation between the editors and the leadership to avoid personalization. But a base level of familiarity with how Wikipedia and its sister projects work should be a prerequisite. I'm curious if there's anyone currently at the WMF who has other necessary qualifications and could be a possible candidate. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0