My request for adminship was closed as successful (221/0/1) on March 1, 2025. This is a debrief of my process to get there, and some takeaways from my experience. I hope you find it informative, or at the very least, interesting. I've broken it up into five sections: not wanting to run, deciding and preparing to run, the RfA itself, reflecting on the process, and thanking people.

For roughly three years I had people asking me to run for adminship, and I refused. I didn't want to run for multiple reasons: I didn't think I was qualified, I didn't think I was active enough, I wasn't confident enough, and I didn't want to run during a trial period. Not all of these were true by the end, though—I was elected (partially) because I'm self-reflective, and holding multiple nomination offers whilst claiming you are unqualified doesn't quite embody that.

The biggest bottleneck among these factors was definitely my confidence. For a long time I felt that I was competent in the areas I wanted to do admin work in, but that I hadn't achieved the mastery I felt I needed to run for adminship.

To be clear, RfA's culture was not a reason for my procrastination. I wasn't very worried about the RfA climate. That is not a reflection on whether I thought I would pass or not, but my understanding of the system and how I thought it would treat me if things went south. I think I was probably an unusual candidate in that I opposed multiple (seven) candidates before running, some quite early on. I always tried to be honest but respectful in my opposition, and I think it helped me in my own run—I was able to draw on my votes and think critically about myself. I also thought that knowing how it feels to oppose someone would help me deal with opposition against myself, but I suppose that went untested.

I reached a point in September 2024 where I was sick of waiting for administrator actions I felt that I could perform myself. My activity and my confidence had both improved, and I decided to start formally planning for an RfA. I briefly considered running in the admin elections, but I felt they would be too unpredictable and that my relatively low name recognition would benefit from more individual attention, not less.

In early December, I reached out to Kevin (L235) to ask what he thought my chances were at a run in February. His assessment was very positive, and he offered to nominate me. I thought it would be good to have a co-nom with a slightly different body of work, and so I messaged Lee Vilenski, who had offered me a nomination a few months earlier. Both of them were happy to jointly nominate me.

I'd agreed with my nominators that Kevin would create the page late GMT on the Friday, and I'd transclude Saturday morning (GMT). I got really sick pretty much immediately after transcluding—the sickest I had been in 10 or so years. I am IMMENSELY grateful that I was asked very few questions, and had I been asked the more common 10–15, I would have seriously considered asking the bureaucrats to put the RfA on hold for a few days. The whole run went extremely smoothly, thankfully.

I am under no illusion that I had a difficult or stressful RfA. I never saw an oppose vote, I only made eight edits to the RfA page, and I was asked the fewest questions of any unopposed RfA candidate in over eight years. The run really was as mundane as it seems. I spent most of the first four days watching Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend clips and sleeping.

Per the previous paragraph, I'm not going to give advice on how to navigate a stressful run, but I do have some tips and observations I think could be useful.

• The best decision I made throughout the entire RfA process was waiting. If I ran with my first nomination offer, I probably would have done no better than a cratchat and even if I passed, I would have been overwhelmed. Nobody is destined to pass, let alone pass unopposed; hell, I would even say that anyone who genuinely thinks they will pass unopposed is probably either too naive or too arrogant to be an admin.
• Stay honest with yourself when preparing. I was re-reading my old content in preparation and realized that I did not like the way my AMPOL GA was written whatsoever. I'd never been particularly pleased with it, but knowing it would come under scrutiny, I rewrote pretty much the whole thing. It wasn't fun (at ALL), but it definitely improved the article and gave me the confidence to go into my RfA less doubtful of my work. In truth, that article was my biggest concern going into my RfA, and in the end nobody mentioned it. I can't say that would have happened had I not worked on it in February.
• Make sure you actually answer Q3. It asks about a time you were stressed or involved in a conflict. It doesn't ask for an impersonal rehashing of WP:DISPUTE. Make sure your answer couldn’t have been written by anyone else—the situation I gave in my answer (disputing a maintenance tag on something I wrote) was pretty trivial, but it won me support for giving real evidence of my behavior.
• Don't dismiss the positivity. So much of the discussion about RfA is about toxicity and dysfunction, but before, during, and after my run I was the recipient of lots of praise and generosity; the former mostly from people I'd never interacted with. I don't think people fully appreciate how many others like to see candidates succeed, whether that's through helping them prepare or supporting them. It's nice. Be cautious about RfA, but don't be cynical.
• Be careful with sarcasm if you don't know the candidate. There were one or two occasions where my heart skipped a beat seeing a comment from someone I didn't know and being unsure whether it was scathing criticism or some light humor. Thankfully in all instances it was the latter, but I would tread lightly with jokey criticism if the candidate doesn't know you. For cardiac health, if nothing else...
• Some people have deranged takes on olives.

The next few points are more geared towards people thinking of running an RfA.

• Reading RfAs of people with similar candidate profiles is super useful. You'll see the types of questions you might be asked and be able to anticipate common concerns with candidates originating from similar parts of the wiki as you.
• Before you run, ask for an evaluation from someone whom you respect but don't know personally. I did this, and it was super insightful to get a different perspective on myself. I owe it to Sennecaster for the idea.
• Read RfA debriefs, recent RfAs, and RfAs by candidates of a similar profile to you (e.g. I read Spicy’s RfA closely). All the recent debriefs are worth reading, but I found HouseBlaster's particularly helpful. Speaking of: my RfA soundtrack was "Paradise" by Coldplay. Pretty apt, given that the music video is about escaping to a savanna.
• Wait for people you don't know super well to reach out to you. I found the Dunning-Kruger effect to be really strong regarding readiness for adminship, and so seeing how other people evaluate your chances is a good test of whether you're actually fit. Even if you think you're low profile, an RfA needs momentum in support to do well, and a nom offer from someone you don't know is a good bar to set for that kind of name recognition.
• On the flip side, if you're worried about declining nomination offers, it's okay. I declined 11.

My RfA was the product of the public and private kindness of many people around me. This doesn't happen without them. So, a major thank you to:

• Kevin, for your incredibly kind nomination statement and unwavering advocacy for me. There's something I find deeply funny about the fact I was co-nominated by the guy who, five years ago, had to gave me three temporary grants of rollback before he trusted me with it indefinitely.
• Lee, for your steadying presence during the run and your thoughtful and personal nomination statement, which covered my profile in a way I was honored by.
• Blablubbs, for your invaluable advice and for giving me the confidence to finally approach my nominators.
• Sennecaster, for sharing your RfA experience with me without reservation (and listening to my unhinged ramblings when I was bored and sick).
• Leeky, for double-checking my assessed content work even after I declined your nom offer.
• GeneralNotability, for returning to support me after what you went through—I enjoyed plenty of kind words over that week, but your actions meant something special.
• PMC, for fighting with humor in the comments and keeping my head on straight.
• Someone who I did not ask for permission to publicly name, for sending me emotional support memes when I was sick. Laughter is medicine.

Of course, I'm also super grateful to my enforcers monitors ScottishFinnishRadish and Ganesha811, and to everyone who reached out publicly and privately with kind messages and support. It meant a lot.