The Signpost

Related articles

Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
23 June 2017

Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
11 November 2015

Security issue fixed; VisualEditor changes
4 February 2015

A busy week: Git switchover, mobile site upgraded, and still time for three security releases
26 March 2012

Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
23 August 2010

More articles

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

This would be a good time for editors, especially administrators, to change passwords and use a good one. Jonathunder (talk) 00:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • RfA reform, again: The long and convoluted RfC tells us nothing new. Started by well meaning relative necomers to the challenge of RfA reform, preferring not to take any cues or clues from the mighty work that was done at WP:RFA2011, they naīvely thought that reinventing the RfC wheel would prod some of those oft proposed reforms into action. Refreshing though to see it confirmed that 5 years ago we weren't wrong. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps I am misreading your comment, but it appears you are applauding a failure to improve the Wiki. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I could not help but notice that the editor who started wp:RFA2015 was recently rewarded with a mop. Ottawahitech (talk) 18:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]
  • NOTHERE I said this on the talk page, but I'll put it here too: How is this not already *the* core principle of this place? People have been banned for it a decade ago. Why don't we ban everyone who disagrees with it? What's wrong with people who don't accept it? DreamGuy (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why don't we ban everyone who disagrees with everyone? - üser:Altenmann >t 16:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0