The Signpost
 
Dispatches


Dispatches

GA Sweeps End, 2,810 articles swept

Contribute  —  
Share this
By David Fuchs, Nehrams2020, and OhanaUnited
GA Sweeps reviews by month
Breakdown of the outcomes for all 2,810 articles

After thirty months, WikiProject Good articles' long-running Sweeps have ended. Proposed in 2007 by LaraLove (now known as Jennavecia), the Sweeps were an effort to double-check every Good Article passed before August 2007 for continued compliance with the good article criteria. At the time, the process and the criteria had greatly changed since the inception of Good Articles in October 2005: the current nominator-reviewer system was not introduced until March 2006, while the current criteria date back to mid 2007. Since previously listed articles exhibited a wide range of article quality, it was agreed to check all articles listed before a cutoff date of August 26, 2007. Editors worked from the list of more than 2,800 Good Articles on that date, a process that continued until the final article, Condoleezza Rice, was swept by Jezhotwells.

Initially, the Sweeps project was only open to invited participants with extensive experience reviewing Good Articles—at the start, there were eleven: OhanaUnited, Dinosaur puppy, Derek.cashman, Drewcifer3000, Nehrams2020, Geometry guy, Jennavecia, Johnfos, Epbr123, AshLin, and Ruslik0. Additional reviewers were gradually added, for a total of 52 editors by Sweeps' end. In the first six months 486 articles were swept, roughly 17% of the total; however progress slowed considerably, hitting a low of just two articles swept during April 2009 (monthly totals can be seen at right). By that point, just under 50% of the articles had been swept. Nehrams2020 spearheaded an attempt to increase momentum, resulting in 396 articles being swept the following month, the highest total during Sweeps. The number of articles swept decreased steadily from that high, but picked up again during the homestretch following the holiday months.

While many editors contributed to the Sweeps, the lion's share of the work was done by just a few dedicated volunteers. The ten most active reviewers—Masem, Epbr123, H1nkles, Ruslik0, Lampman, Jezhotwells, David Fuchs, jackyd101, Malleus Fatuorum, and Nehrams2020—contributed 1,794 sweeps, or ~64%, of the Sweeps reviews; Nehrams2020 alone contributed 514 reviews, or 18%, of the total. The 52 reviewers delisted 964 articles (~34%) while 1,456 (52%) retained their GA status. The remaining 390 articles were exempt from Sweeps, due to merges, deletions, prior GARs, or promotions to Featured Article or List status.

A list of the articles delisted can be found in this Sweeps subpage. Some articles may already have regained Good Article status, but those interested can see which articles still need work.

See also

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Magnificent work - confidence levels in GAs improved greatly! It's also good to know that large tasks can actually get completed! Lee∴V (talkcontribs) 12:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to commend the hard-working GA reviewers for an excellent job, but highlight a frequent problem with medical articles at GA. Many of the GA medical articles rely on primary sources, rather than secondary reviews, and do not conform to WP:MEDRS. I hope some attention can be shone on this issue by posting it here to wide readership. An explanation of how to determine PMID reviews can be found at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches; I had intended to help identify the deficient medical articles during the sweeps, but was never able to complete that work. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent work by everyone involved! bahamut0013wordsdeeds 13:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
An inspiring story, showing that progress can be made, even when we have backlogs like this. Thanks! HereToHelp (talk to me) 18:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0