ArbCom update

ArbCom member announces that she will not run in December

Related articles
ArbCom update

A chat with the elected Arbitrators
6 February 2006

Jimbo Wales appoints 11 arbitrators, increases committee size
23 January 2006

Arbitration Committee elections continue; ArbCom member resigns
16 January 2006

ArbCom candidates (part two)
9 January 2006

ArbCom candidates
2 January 2006

Straw poll closes
19 December 2005

Jimbo starts new poll regarding election
5 December 2005

Last chance to run for ArbCom
28 November 2005

ArbCom voting process
14 November 2005

ArbCom duties and requirements
7 November 2005

A closer look: the calls for reform of the ArbCom
31 October 2005

A look back: the 2004 ArbCom elections
24 October 2005

Current ArbCom members
17 October 2005

Criticism of the ArbCom
10 October 2005

About the Arbitration process
3 October 2005

The history of the Arbitration Committee
26 September 2005

Introduction to a special series: A look at the upcoming Arbitration Committee elections
19 September 2005


More articles

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

It wasn't just an objection to Kelly, but to the five in total. Bureaucratic instruction creep - David Gerard 09:51, 14 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • It gets slightly more complex than that. Some people object to checkuser period, some people object to checkuser being given to the Jimbo-appointed arbiters (as opposed to community-elected arbiters) and some people object to checkuser being given to Kelly. It is left as an exercise to the reader which of these objections (if any) have good reasoning behind them. Radiant_>|< 13:29, 14 November 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]





       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0