Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/From the editors
It seems that, more than commemorating the great moments in our history, more than even anticipating great sporting events, what our audience wants is the weird. When two 12-year-old girls say that a fictional character created on an internet forum inspired them to stab their friend 19 times, or when an emotionally troubled soldier who may or may not be a deserter is released in exchange for five high level Guantanamo detainees after spending so long with the Taliban he has lost familiarity with English, people rush online to make sense of things. It is a reminder of our duty as Wikipedians to make sense, something we have a patchy record of actually doing.
For the full top 25 list, see WP:TOP25. See this section for an explanation for any exclusions.
For the week of 1 to 7 June, the 10 most popular articles on Wikipedia, as determined from the report of the 5,000 most viewed pages, were:
Rank | Article | Class | Views | Image | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Slender Man | 817,896 | OK. Here is when I declare a conflict of interest: I am the creator and maintainer of this article; not that I'm particularly disposed to create articles like this – it was just kinda foisted on me. The circumstances are outside the scope of this list, but might make an interesting Signpost article some day. Anyway, I'm pretty sure that, however my position may colour by biases, they won't be all that different from yours – i.e., when two girls who are either psychotic or psychopathic use a fictional character from a thousand mildly uninspired fanfics as an excuse to stab an unsuspecting classmate 19 times and leave her for dead in the forest, it's better to look at them rather than at the character. Needless to say, the media did the opposite, and thus turned what had been a rapidly ageing meme into a full on cybernetic demon. | ||
2 | 2014 FIFA World Cup | 707,834 | It took 29 months and 820 qualifying matches involving 207 national teams representing more than 99 percent of the world's population, but we're down to the final week before the game literally kicks off on Thursday. The final 32 comes complete with the traditional first timers (Bosnia), the heavy favourites (five-time winners and hosts Brazil), dark horses (Honduras) European stalwarts (Germany, Spain, England, Italy, and France) and African hopefuls (Ivory Coast, Ghana, Nigeria, Cameroon). Now all that remains is to see whether Brazil can get its act together and finish construction in time. And if they can pull that off, they may even be able to explain why they built a 42,000-seat stadium in the middle of the Amazon jungle. | ||
3 | Game of Thrones | 697,515 | New seasons of this immensely popular show always draw people to Wikipedia. That it nearly topped the World Cup the week before it began shows how seriously people are taking it. | ||
4 | Normandy landings | 665,485 | Friday marked the 70th anniversary of this epochal invasion, which many feel marked the point at which the Allies started winning World War II. The largest seaborne invasion in history, it nonetheless caught the Axis off-guard, thanks to a brilliantly effective deception campaign. Memorials were held on the site to commemorate the nearly 10,000 people on both sides who died that day. | ||
5 | Game of Thrones (season 4) | 615,681 | This is the page with the plot synopses for each episode. | ||
6 | Bowe Bergdahl | 551,453 | Bowe Bergdahl must qualify as the most controversial non-fictional individual in the US right now. Is he a hero? A victim? A traitor? However you may label him, you can't deny that there isn't a point in his story, from his decision to AWOL in the first place, to his detention by the Taliban, to President Obama's decision to trade him for five high-level Guantanamo Bay prisoners, that isn't cause for uncertainty. | ||
7 | List of Game of Thrones episodes | 519,354 | The episode list is probably used to look up air dates. | ||
8 | The Fault in Our Stars | 504,006 | Youtube sensei John Green's romantic tearjerker was already a hit with the cyber-set, but boomed up the bestseller list thanks to the opening of its film adaptation. | ||
9 | Maleficent (film) | 498,208 | Disney's rather startling subversion of one of their most popular tales has left an aftertaste in critics' mouths (its Rotten Tomatoes rating is currently just 50%) but audiences have been positively scarfing it; it earned nearly $130 million in its first ten days. | ||
10 | 2014 in film | 423,834 | A new entry for the list, probably in preparation for the northern summer movie season. |
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/In the media Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Technology report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Opinion
Eleven public relations agencies have declared their intention to follow "ethical engagement practices" in Wikipedia editing. William Beutler, who has edited the site since 2006, kicked off the initiative by hosting a closed-door meeting at the Donovan House in Washington DC with several PR professionals and Wikipedians. The results were published last Tuesday: a joint statement from the participating PR agencies—representing five of the top ten global agencies and all but one of the top ten in the United States—clarifying their views and practices with regards to the Wikimedia projects. They committed themselves:
- To seek to better understand the fundamental principles guiding Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.
- To act in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those related to "conflict of interest."
- To abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use.
- To the extent we become aware of potential violations of Wikipedia policies by our respective firms, to investigate the matter and seek corrective action, as appropriate and consistent with our policies.
- Beyond our own firms, to take steps to publicize our views and counsel our clients and peers to conduct themselves accordingly.
Beutler told the Signpost in a separate interview this week that "It's a challenge to communicate best practices through an entire agency, particularly on a topic relatively niche as Wikipedia. But it's important that they're now making an effort to do so."
But what caused them to issue such a statement? PR agencies have had a rocky history with Wikipedia, beginning with Gregory Kohs, who founded a company (MyWikiBiz) with the express purpose of creating and editing Wikipedia articles on behalf of paying corporations. He was promptly blocked by Jimmy Wales, the site's co-founder.
Still, with the gate open, others followed: the Signpost's archives, for example, hold stories on Microsoft's attempts to monitor articles (2007), the Nichalp/Zithan case (2009), and a PR firm's problematic edits ("The Bell Pottinger affair"; 2011).
Steps were laid by a British association for ethical engagement with Wikipedia, but these efforts were overshadowed a year later by Wiki-PR, which created, edited, or maintained several thousand Wikipedia articles for paying clients before being exposed. Their edits were quickly met with a cease and desist order from the Wikimedia Foundation, and while they claimed that they were "demonized" by the WMF, their action in renaming themselves in February this year suggests that they might yet be a problem for the movement.
For their part, Beutler and his compatriots recognize that they have a long way to go to obtain the Wikimedia community's trust: "I'm very happy with the attention we've had this week, but I hope no one thinks that anything has been solved":
“ | The purpose of this statement was to show that Wikipedia and communications professionals are not so far apart as either side might have thought before.
There is a very long road ahead, where a difficult conversation must take place. I do expect that disagreements will occur, and even the companies who have signed onto this will not be able to keep everyone in line just yet. I am hopeful that the agencies involved can rise to meet the requirements that may be set by the new Terms of Use, and where they are not, we need to find a mechanism to bring them back to the fold. Likewise, I am optimistic that Wikipedians are ready to put community resources toward answering the challenges that will come about from outside interests asking Wikipedia why certain articles say things they don't think are accurate or up-to-date—and will help address these issues. |
” |
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/In focus Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Arbitration report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Humour