In an effort to restructure the process for starting new Wikipedia editions, it was proposed last week that a group of experts screen requests for new languages. The current system, which involves community debates of requests for new languages and sometimes the use of a test Wikipedia to demonstrate feasibility, has been a source of ongoing friction.

On Tuesday, Jimmy Wales proposed a new system for approving the launch of Wikipedia in new languages. The system would involve creating a committee of experts to give advisory opinions on whether a proposal involves "an actual language or merely a dialect." An outside body could be used if a suitable one is available, although existing standards such as ISO 639 and the Ethnologue have been used more as a starting point and are not widely accepted as definitive.

In his comments, Wales also outlined some principles for deciding what language editions would be appropriate. First of all, he said that editions should be encouraged "in all legitimate living natural languages". Wales indicated that it should be made easy for fluent and especially native speakers of such languages to get started.

Dialects and constructed languages would be governed by different principles, and Wikipedia editions for these would be generally discouraged (although not forbidden). Wales stated that he was concerned about these being advanced primarily for political reasons, as well as the potential for hoaxes.

The addition of new languages has been controversial for some time. Many recent requests to start a new Wikipedia language edition have been for archaic languages (such as Gothic and Old English) or for languages closely related to an existing Wikipedia language. Requests of the latter type tend to raise questions about whether the language is not really just a dialect, along with the argument that anyone speaking it is adequately served by Wikipedia already.

This tension arises in part because of Wikipedia's stated goal of distributing an encyclopedia to everyone "in their own language." A few languages remain without a Wikipedia, but most of the easy cases are in parts of the world with limited internet access. Thus even if the wiki has been created, in many cases nobody has stepped forward to help start writing Wikipedia content in the language. Wales did indicate that using Wikipedia to preserve language and culture was acceptable in situations where few native speakers exist, citing Cornish as an example.

At the same time, creating a Wikipedia edition to advance a particular linguistic agenda arguably violates the neutral point of view policy. For example, the existence of four separate Wikipedias for Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, and Serbo-Croatian has frequently been criticized. Reliance on ISO 639 codes resulted in the creation of separate editions, but the question of whether these are distinct languages is heavily politicized.

A special case is the Chinese Wikipedia, since as a spoken language Chinese has several varieties that are often mutually unintelligible, but these nevertheless largely share the same written form based on the grammar of the Mandarin variety. As a result, repeated requests to start a Cantonese Wikipedia have never been acted upon, and an existing Wikipedia in Min Nan has never been fully accepted. The situation is further complicated by concerns among Chinese Wikipedia community members about their project's relatively small size considering its potential population base, leading some to argue that splitting efforts into multiple Wikipedias is undesirable for the time being. Again, political implications come into play, and the PRC's ongoing block of Wikipedia access in mainland China (see archived stories) also exacerbates the problem.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees has scheduled another fundraising drive for December and is advertising for a professional conference organizer to assist with next year's Wikimania conference.

The Board released minutes from a meeting held earlier this month, indicating that a fundraiser has been scheduled to start 1 December. It will run for three weeks, similar to the most recent drive during August and September. Unlike previous fundraisers, no fixed amount has been stated as a goal, and the fundraiser will simply last for the period of time set.

This schedule is moved up compared to earlier discussions, which had tentatively focused on holding the next fundraiser after the new year. Additional funds remain critical to supplying the hardware necessary to keep the site operating. As part of the meeting, the Board authorized an additional $50,000 expenditure for hardware, but noted that this "could stretch thin available cash resources." Since then, the fund drive start date was moved back a week. It will now be held from Friday 9 December to Saturday 31 December.

Meanwhile, the Wikimedia Foundation is also looking for an experienced professional to help with Wikimania 2006, to be held in Boston in late July or early August. The conference organizer will be hired on a contract basis and work part-time as needed during the year, and full-time prior to and during the conference. Fluency in English and at least one other language is desired. Interested parties are instructed to contact the Board directly about the position.

In additional activity, the Board decided not to give its approval yet to the launch of a proposed Wikiversity project (see archived story), but indicated that with some changes and further discussion the possibility remains open for the future.

Article validation is set to be enabled on Wikipedia "very soon", according to David Gerard. Currently, Brion is "cleaning it up" for usage.

• Wikipedia is #8 in the Nielsen/NetRatings list for Top 10 Online News & Information Destinations. [1] (Wikipedia is the first open citizen-powered site to crack the top ten, says Steve Rubel. [2])
• The Danish Wikipedia has reached 35,000 articles.
• The Bosnian Wikipedia has reached 5,000 articles.
• The Romanian Wikipedia has reached 15,000 articles.
• The Telugu Wikipedia has reached 2,000 articles.
• The Udmurt Wikipedia has reached 100 articles.

The December print issue of Esquire magazine includes "Wikiworld: The Experiment", the article that seventy five Wikipedians collaborated on for Esquire editor A.J. Jacobs. (see archived story) The article compares before and after versions of Wikipedia:Improve this article about Wikipedia, noting the deliberate errors in the original (including one that Wikipedians failed to correct: the number of articles in Britannica), and making various comments about the experiment. Also in the article is a sidebar profiling Jimmy and giving more context about the project itself.

The first few paragraphs can be read at KeepMedia; the rest is available online only to subscribers of the print magazine.

Semi-weekly Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta published "Зрители снимаются с мест" on November 21. The article discusses the tendency of modern people to want to control the information they receive. The examples include TiVo and LiveJournal as well as Wikipedia, which it describes as "the most popular free-of-charge online encyclopedia, one of the 50 most visited websites in the world."

On November 21, "Wikipedia: the dawn of democratic media?" was published by I&DeA Knowledge, the online journal for the Improvement and Development Agency which is targeted at United Kingdom local government professionals. The interview with Jimbo Wales is an introduction to Wikipedia. Wales says, "We are deeply committed to being a fully global project, and so I have thought to myself that I will feel that my life work is complete when we have at least 250,000 reasonably high quality articles in enough different languages that 99 per cent of all people on the planet can use them."

During a trip to Australia for the X|Media|Lab international digital media conference, Wikimedia Foundation member Angela Beesley gave an interview to The Age which appeared on November 22 under the headline "Quest for the universal Wiki". Angela describes Wikipedia: "You need to find a balance between discussing every little change and just getting on with it. There's not really a concept of leaders within Wikipedia. It's very much a bottom-up process with the community deciding. Currently there's a split in the community about whether voting is really useful. We end up with what we call a rough consensus where most people at least agree enough that they're going to stop arguing about it." Angela also met with other Wikipedians at a meetup in Sydney.

Author Peter Morville, mentioned two weeks ago for his discussion of Wikipedia in Business Weekly, is again touting Wikipedia in interviews promoting his book. On November 1, Boxes and Arrows published "Ambient Findability: Talking with Peter Morville". Journalist Liz Danzico asks "If [Encyclopaedia Britannica's] findability were greater, would Wikipedia have a viable competitor on its hands?" Morville replies: "I did a great deal of research for my book. And I made extensive use of licensed bibliographic and full-text databases. But the Wikipedia was the single most useful source. Findability is only part of its success. It’s also strong in quality, currency and breadth of coverage. As the world’s largest, most popular encyclopedia, the Wikipedia illustrates the efficacy of open source content creation and the power of collective intelligence. So, in short, the answer is no. Wikipedia has nothing to fear from EB."

The long article "Wikipedia: A Techno-Cult of Ignorance" bills itself as a manifesto against Wikipedia, and appears to be written by the editors and subjects of aetherometry, "the experimental and theoretical study of massfree energy".

The irregularly updated webcomic Kernel Panic published a strip on November 23 titled "Wiki is the new black", about deletionism.

Wikipedia was cited in the last week in the following publications:

• Times of India (India), on The finger [3]
• ARRL, on CONELRAD [4]
• Norwich Bulletin (Connecticut, USA), on Black Friday [5]
• Minnesota Daily (Minnesota, USA), on Congress of the United States [6]
• Kathmandu Post (Nepal), on Sun Myung Moon [7]
• Manila Standard (Philippines), on dyslexia [8]
• Green Bay Press Gazette (Wisconsin, USA), on Art Fiala [9]
• Hattiesburg American (Mississippi, USA), on turducken [10]
• OnMilwaukee.com (Wisconsin, USA), on Black Friday [11]
• Hopewell Valley News (New Jersey, USA), on Sarah Josepha Hale [12]
• American Thinker (Arizona, USA), on Human Rights Watch [13]
• Knoxville News Sentinel (Tennessee, USA), on dog [14]

A request for bureaucratship is underway for Johnleemk.

Twelve users were granted admin status this week: Jareth (nom), Ann Heneghan (nom), MONGO (nom), Yelyos (nom), The Tom (nom), Jkelly (nom), Miborovsky (nom), Hiding (nom), Demi (nom), MarkGallagher (nom), Sean Black (nom) and Harro5 (nom).

Notably, MarkGallagher received 100 support votes and 0 oppose votes. According to Zzyzx11's RFA nomination records page, MarkGallagher is only the fourth admin to reach 100 support votes, and the first since Func's 112 supports in August.

Eight articles were featured this week: History of the Jews in Poland, Yuan (surname), StarCraft, Omnipotence paradox, Claudius, Arrested Development (TV series), Rosa Parks and Dawson Creek, British Columbia.

No lists reached featured list status this week.

Three pictures reached featured picture status this week:

• 
  Cirrus cloud
• 
  Ripening
• 
  Poverty

On 15 November, twenty new servers were ordered. Ten of these servers will be used as cache servers, while the other ten will be used as multi-purpose application servers. In all, the server order totaled approximately US$50,080.00.

Currently, $114,436.00 has been spent on hardware during the fourth quarter; altogether, $285,676.00 has been spent on hardware in 2005.

Developer Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason has created a new page for citing articles, Special:Cite. Links to this page can be found in the toolbox when viewing pages in the article namespace. The page shows information about a given article necessary for citing articles, and generates citations in different citation styles, including APA, MLA, and Chicago.

A new site status page has been created by Ambush Commander, in response to the 'unwieldy' nature of editing the current status page, hosted on OpenFacts. Rather than using a conventional wiki environment, the page allows a user to select a series of options to display the current status and leave a comment.

Images and image uploads were disabled for a time on 22 November while a new image server, 'amane', was installed. The outage was necessary to allow the copying of images from 'khaldun', 'bacon', and 'albert'.

Other server-related events, problems, and changes included:

• 23 November — Routing problems involving certain Cogent IPs fixed.
• 26 November — 'Srv5' breaks, taken offline.
• 27 November — Wikipedia-l, Wikien-l, and Helpdesk-l lists blocked in the Robots.txt file, following complaints that 'newbie questions', often embarrassing, were showing up in search results.

The Arbitration Committee closed three cases this week.

A case against Lightbringer was closed on Wednesday. As a result, Lightbringer has been placed on personal attack parole for six months. In addition, Lightbringer has been banned indefinitely from editing article and talk pages relating to freemasonry. Lightbringer had made personal attacks against other users, and according to the ruling, had a 'passionate POV' in freemasonry-related articles.

A case against Maoririder was closed on Saturday. As a result, it was ruled that Maoririder shall receive a mentor, possibly assigned from the mediation committee.

A case against Silverback was closed on Monday. As a result, Silverback has been placed on personal attack parole for six months. In addition, Silverback has been limited to one revert per article per week. Silverback was accused of making personal attacks, and edit warring on Iraq-related articles.

Cases were accepted this week against numerous editors on Neuro-linguistic programming, editors Ted Wilkes, Wyss, and Onefortyone, editors on climate change-related articles, AndriyK (user page), and EffK (user page). All are in the evidence phase.

Other cases against Johnski (user page), a series of editors on Winter Soldier, Xed (user page), Pigsonthewing (user page), Copperchair (user page), and numerous editors on Ted Kennedy, are in the evidence phase.

Cases against numerous editors on Political Research Associates, Rangerdude (user page), and Ultramarine are in the voting phase.

Motions to close are on the table in cases against Rex071404 (user page) and Instantnood (user page).