The Signpost

File:Osama Khalid - EFF - Offline.jpg
EFF
CC-By 4.0
175
10
650
News and notes

Offline: Osama Khalid still in prison

Contribute   —  
Share this
By Bluerasberry, Bri, Mitchsavl, Andreas Kolbe and Soni
EFF describes those imprisoned for user-generated content as "offline"

EFF campaigns for Osama Khalid's freedom

Osama sitting at a table in front of a computer, where the computer is covered in stickers from nonprofit community tech organizations
Wikimania 2014, stickers on laptop include GNU, Global Voices, LibreOffice, The Pirate Bay, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Wikipedia

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has launched a campaign calling for release from prison for Osama Khalid (User:OsamaK), who has been imprisoned in Saudi Arabia since 2020 for editing Wikipedia (see previous Signpost coverage). Without intervention, he is due for release in 2034. EFF has further profiled Osama as "Offline", which is their broader effort to recognize people who are imprisoned for sharing media, and the context of how and why people face opposition to information sharing.

Osama was very active as a Wikipedia editor in English and Arabic, as a bot operator, in the Wikipedia IRC group chat, and he attended the international Wikimania conference multiple times. He is known to many Wikipedians both online and through in-person events, including his volunteering to teach Wikipedia editing to students at medical schools. Among the many topics he edited, Osama collaborated with Wikimedia LGBT+ to develop medical articles related to sexual health, sexually transmitted infection, and reproductive health into that group's discussion, and to coordinate translation of health topics between English and Arabic.

As previously reported by The Signpost, a coalition of organizations began to publicly call for his release in 2024. Osama was arrested along with fellow Wikipedia editor and physician colleague Ziyad al-Sufiani (User:Ziad), who was released in 2025. – BR

Wikinews officially shuts down

The Wikimedia Foundation has officially closed Wikinews, one of its longest-lasting projects, on May 4, 2026. Editing and new content creation will no longer be possible, with all of the pages on the site locked in read-only mode.

First launched in November 2004, following an online vote on Meta, Wikinews was an official Wikimedia project based on news reporting and citizen journalism, as well as one of the first portals to set that mission for itself, having been intended by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales as a way to write each story "as a news story, as opposed to an encyclopedia article". However, throughout its history, the purpose of Wikinews was repeatedly questioned, with some observers pointing out how Wikipedia already provided high-quality coverage of recent events, while others criticized the project's perceived lack of commitment to a neutral point of view. Plus, Wikinews always struggled to gain momentum in comparison to other Wikimedia portals throughout the years: at the time of its shutdown, the platform was active in 31 languages, with just over 700 active editors across the board.

This resulted in a group of users forking away, before multiple calls for the closure of the project were made. These efforts culminated in a 2024 public consultation, which concluded that:

Wikinews is not viable as a global, multi-lingual sister project in the Wikimedia ecosystem and supported by the Wikimedia Foundation. The project does not fill a need in the world through useful articles, significant readership, or significant volunteer engagement. News articles are not a good fit for the wiki model, as shown in the low editor engagement and few revisions over time. There are many stronger alternatives for the broader mission of non-profit news.

In November 2025, the Sister Projects Task Force (SPTF) advised the BoT to cease the activity of Wikinews permanently, a decision that eventually came into full effect back in March of this year.

You can find more details in our prior coverage and in this month's Special report. – B, O

Administrator elections

TKTK

Nominations for the May 2026 administrator elections began 00:00, 29 April 2026 (UTC), followed by a call for candidates through May 5, then the Discussion phase May 8–12. The Voting phase was open May 13–19.

Results were posted at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Results on 20 May. The administrators elected were (in alphabetical order):

All were elected with between 80 and 90 percent approval. Two additional candidates were not elected. – B

Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee elections

Voting is open for the 2026 election of Universal Code of Conduct coordinators until June 2 (midnight UTC).

The committee is tasked with providing an "equitable and consistent implementation of the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC)."

Editors can vote once if they meet the following criteria:

M

Forms 990 for Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Endowment

image of a paper form with small illegible writing
The Form 990 is a United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) form comprising several dozen pages (shown here: page 1 of a blank form) that provides the public with detailed financial information about a nonprofit organization.

On Diff, the Wikimedia Foundation announced publication of the most important financial form for nonprofits, the Form 990, for both the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikimedia Endowment. The WMF's Form 990 is available to view here and the endowment's 990 is here. Both forms cover the 2024–2025 financial year, except for compensation data, which is for the 2024 calendar year.

Judging by the forms' financial info, the Foundation appears to be in good financial health. The forms show net assets of –

The highest-paid WMF executives listed on the WMF's Form 990 for the reporting period were then-CEO Maryana Iskander, CPTO Selena Deckelmann and CAO Lisa Seitz, with total reported compensation of $553,360, $517,425 and $463,076 respectively. 271 WMF staff received more than $100,000 of reportable compensation. The Wikimedia Endowment has no paid staff of its own. – AK

Wikimedia Café

There will be two Wikimedia Café discussion opportunities during the last weekend of May. Both sessions will focus on the the 2026-2027 Wikimedia Foundation Annual Plan. Participants may attend either or both sessions.

  1. Saturday, 30 May 2026 at 15:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to the Americas, Africa, and Europe.
  2. Sunday, 31 May 2026 at 05:00 UTC (timestamp converter), at a time friendly to Asia and the Pacific.

Café participants are highly encouraged to read in advance at least this summary of the plan. Optionally, Café participants are encouraged to read portions of the plan that interest them and ask questions or provide feedback on the Annual Plan talk page.

Please see the Café page for more information, including tables of timestamp conversions for both sessions, the agenda, and how to register!

CommTech team disbanded, community outrage follows

On 21 May, User:SCherukuwada (WMF) (Deputy Chief Product & Technology Officer at WMF) announced that 6 members of the Community Tech team were laid off, with the team at large disbanded. Among other things, CommTech supported the Community Wishlist, with a number of the laid off employees also being long standing volunteer contributors.

This decision has caused significant community outrage. According to a comment on meta from technical contributor, Sohom

I would trust [the 6 fired employees to figure out] what the community wants more than anything, and the fact that the Foundation does not see the immediate benefit in retaining these engineers in a job where they explicitly work on community-requested features feels extremely sad and is a significant problem.

Some editors have claimed a connection between the firings and attempts at unionising the WMF. So far, a hundred editors have signed a petition signifying solidarity with the union. WMF legal counsel Stephen LaPorte later clarified that the Foundation respects the right of the staff to unionise, and will proceed to negotiate in good faith.

With the situation still evolving, The Signpost will be covering this topic in depth in the next issue. – S

Brief notes

Signpost
In this issue
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Union busting allegations

@Soni: I agree that the disbanding of the Community Tech team is worrying news regarding the WMF-community relations in general (also with regard to the Wishlist, whose gradual dismantling as a way for the community to influence software development we should have covered more at the Signpost over the past few years).

However, your very late addition about this topic here fails basic journalism standard in uncritically repeating the union busting allegations without even so much as mentioning the fairly strong dementi that WMF has issued about this here:

I can also unequivocally confirm this decision is not connected to discussions staff are having about unionising, or terminating staff who have participated in those discussions. We respect staff’s right to have these conversations.

(See also the subsequent "Note from the Wikimedia Foundation on unionization" by the Foundation's legal counsel there, or this comment by User:Hashar, a community member since 2003 and apparently uninvolved in this as a staff member.)

Of course people are free to think that all these WMF employees are lying here, but that still doesn't excuse us as the Signpost to omit this clear dementi by the target of the accusations.

Besides, several aspects about the situation that are emerging now cast serious doubt on the union busting claims. E.g. for all we know at this point, the employment of the affected team members has not been terminated so far (unlike the well-known developer who was indeed let go earlier this month). Yes, their roles have been disbanded and they have to apply internally for other positions or indeed risk losing their employment at WMF eventually, which is a shitty situation to be in. But if WMF's goal was union-busting, why would they even keep them on payroll for the time being, or issue statements like this:

we’re already working with affected staff to expedite interviews for open roles, though this takes time given some of the relevant local regulations around the world.

Again, all this is not to defend WMF's actions overall in disbanding this team. But we really need to do better as the Signpost and not uncritically amplify such rumors insinuating that WMF acted illegally.

Regards, HaeB (talk) 06:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The addition reeks of bias and it is not hard to see why. This should have been written by someone uninvolved and relatively neutral. – robertsky (talk) 07:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertsky, agreed, ideally it would be someone else writing the article; we just didn't have volunteers ready to cover it this issue. In fact, I discussed this topic with Haeb in a private mailing thread to avoid precisely this outcome, hoping that Haeb or one of our copyeditors improves the wording sufficiently before we go live.
As the article is already live, I've added a line to clarify this better. If it's still biased, I'll prefer to take a step back and let someone else handle this best they prefer.
For future issues, I request using our newsroom. That's the best way for uninvolved editors to help our articles be unbiased. Soni (talk) 08:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
When I saw this, I decided to spontaneously start developing an idea for an irregular version which can be published at any time: The Signpost Gap. Wikipedia also has Wikipedia:Goings-on, but this is merely a bulletin with no space for actual articles. I'm hoping that such a thing could provide a venue for articles which would otherwise be added to an issue last minute, or provide important project updates in a matter of days as opposed to up to a month. Mitchsavl (talk) 10:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We don't even know for sure that Brooke Vibber has been completely let go, because her work account has not been locked. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0