The Signpost

Technology report

Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Jarry1250

Staff told: "your input is wanted"

It's not all roses -- we might see more conflict between the two functions, more us vs. them thinking, and more communications breakdowns or forum shopping. But net I think the positives would outweigh the negatives, and there are ways to mitigate against the negatives.

—WMF Vice President of Engineering and Product Development Erik Möller

WMF Executive Director Sue Gardner was forced to clarify this week that proposed structural changes to the Foundation's Engineering and Product Development Department were not a "done deal" and that it was "important that you [particularly affected staff] realise that ... your input is wanted". The reorganisation, announced on November 5 and planned for the middle of next year, will see its two components split off into their own departments.

Gardner's remarks come in the context of a great deal of confusion about the effect of the change, particularly (but not exclusively) from contributors with little industry (or specifically WMF) experience. Similar follow-up posts have seen "Product" defined, a clarification that day-to-day work would still be co-ordinated on a "team" basis, rather than in functional groupings, and several exchanges about the optimal management strategy.

The upshot, Associate Product Manager Steven Walling said, was that what is now "one department [that] includes engineers, designers, product managers, community liaisons, data analysts, and more ... will be two departments, Engineering and Product Development. Each will have their own leaders that report to Sue, instead of everyone reporting to Erik [Möller]. Engineering will contain software engineers and their managers, for the most part. Product Development will contain designers, product managers, and data analysts, for the most part. There will also probably be new Director-level positions under the new departments, such as to manage the design team. "

The move, Möller (currently Vice President of Engineering and Product Development) argues, will allow the WMF to scale as it seeks to refocus on a smaller number of competencies, mostly notably technology. He also wants to see Operations specialists involved earlier in the development procedure and UI/UX developers' time spread more equally among projects.

Other staffing news this week included the WMF's hiring of Juliusz Gonera (whose previous work includes software for aiding the study of macromolecular structure of proteins) as a software developer in its Mobile team and Catalan-contributor Quim Gil as "Technical Contributor Coordinator (IT Communications Manager)". Wikimedia UK also managed to hire two technical contributors to fill the gap after a previous failure to find a suitable candidate for a full-time position earlier this year.

In brief

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for several weeks.

WMF Localisation Team member Santhosh Thottingal addressing the OpenSource Language Summit, held in Pune, India earlier this month. The conference featured on the Wikimedia blog this week.
+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
  • Thanks to the editor for the note about retiring a feature for which there are not resources to adequately manage. I appreciate the managing staff's efforts to maintain quality within the newspaper's scope. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • For those who missed the discussion on the poll: Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-11-12/Technology report (I also added some links pointing to discussions somebody there was looking for). --Nemo 08:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0