Bugs, repairs, and internal operational news

Power outage

On the Wikimedia Techblog, Mark Bergsma explained the root of problems users encountered the morning of Monday, July 5:

“

Starting at 0:10 UTC on July 5th, the Wikimedia Foundation suffered from intermittent, partial power failures in the internal power network of one of its main data centers in Tampa, Florida. Due to the temporary unavailability of several critical systems and the large impact on the available systems capacity, all Wikimedia projects went down. The power situation stabilized at 1:12 UTC, and systems and services recovery has been taking place since.

”

Fortunately, the technicians managed to get everything back up and running shortly afterwards.

Brion Vibber on the future role of the WMF

Following a blog post by Phoebe about Wikimedia's future strategies, Brion Vibber left a detailed comment giving his thoughts. As a former Chief Technical Officer (CTO) and all-round maintainer of Wikimedia projects and the software behind them for a number of years – not to mention the namesake of this report – his thoughts provided a useful insight into the past, present and future of the Wikimedia Foundation's "tech" department:

“

Tech of course is the area I know best, and I can assure you that there will be plenty of work for [the projected] ~75 tech folks to do in 2015; even with the major expansion over the last couple years there’s still wayyy more stuff to do than time to do it. Purely on that end, there are a few rough tasks that need to get taken care of all the time:

keeping the actual site running smoothly – we’re still understaffed on ops, and relatively low-hanging fruit remains in improving proactive & reactive system administration procedures ...
keeping the software development going smoothly – this includes making sure that volunteer devs are getting the attention they need on getting patches cleaned up and accepted, bugs fixed, relevant feature requests implemented and live
minor feature development – things like improving how we can show images, or adding a new file format, or supporting a nicer way to upload a file, whatever. Lots of little things!
major feature development & near-term research – all the awesome work that’s been coming in from the UX team is a big example now....
long-term research – do we even know what needs to be created to make things as kick-ass as they’re going to need to be five or ten years down the pipe?

... A strong “MediaWiki Labs” [as a parallel to Mozilla Labs] research program would be *extremely* awesome, and well worth the money spent, once the resources and organization are all in there to get all the basics past "we keep the site up" and "we’re fixing things we’ve known suck" into really future-focused areas too. From what I see and hear, Danese [Cooper, current CTO] is doing a smashing job at getting tech organized for its big-enough-to-need-real-management present and future, so as long as the rest of the system is working I feel pretty good about the next few years of Wikimedia tech.

”

The full comment is available here. Regular Signpost readers will be pleased to know that an interview with Danese Cooper – to whom Brion referred – should be available shortly.

Wikimania 2010 for Developers

Wikimania 2010, in Gdansk, Poland, opens on July 9. It is scheduled to include a number of talks, workshops and tutorials useful to developers. One session From WMF with love, expressly aimed at the technically minded, is scheduled for Sunday. Its programme comprises:

These are in addition to a wide range of other talks arranged for the long weekend, which is expected to be attended by hundreds of Wikimedians from around the globe.

In brief

Note: not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks. Wikimedia sites now have their own "branch", meaning that it is no longer possible to say that they are running revision X; rather, they are running a mix of different revisions prioritised by importance.

Bug #24167 has been fixed, preventing multiple "warn" edit filters from conflicting with each other and thus preventing an edit from getting through at all.

The 'Languages' section of the sidebar, used for interwiki links, will now stay collapsed if so desired across pages (bug #24140).

The "Peachy" bot framework for PHP moves into official beta mode, with PHP bot operators required to put it through its paces.

The Vector skin went live to 83 WMF wikis (see previous Signpost coverage). One, the Ukrainian Wikipedia, went back to Monobook since the skin had not been sufficiently translated.

← Previous "Technology report"

Next "Technology report" →

In this issue

5 July 2010 (all comments)

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

As the lead developer of Peachy, I disagree with the idea that bot operators are required to use it. I believe that everyone should have an option as to what framework to use. Peachy may be the best in some people's eyes, and in other eyes, it may be far too bloated for the purposes and they may want a small, barebones class. (X! · talk) · @976 · 22:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops, disregard that. I read "PHP bot operators are required to put it through the paces" to mean that all PHP bot operators must change to Peachy, not that testers comprised of PHP bot operators are needed to assist in testing. (X! · talk) · @978 · 22:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"[T]he namesake of this report"? This is "Technology report", not "Brion Vibber report"... OrangeDog (τ • ε) 12:01, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- See the initials of "Bugs, repairs, and internal operational news". --seav (talk) 16:15, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - :O My mind is blown. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 18:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm still sad that "The Report On Lengthy Litigation" feature got renamed to "Arbitration Report". - Banyan Tree 02:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - But we can still cling to DRAMA Discussion report... no, wait, the title of that is no longer a clever acronym either :'(. Have no fear people, BRION is going to remain BRION until... well, someone changes it I guess! - Jarry1250 ^{[Humorous? Discuss.]} 16:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

←Was it indeed renamed "Arbitration report"? If so, thank the gods for it. The irony was lost on many readers ... :-) Tony (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How did I never notice any of these for five years? OrangeDog (τ • ε) 12:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually pretty subtle. I didn't realize it myself a few years ago until it was pointed out. Check out the comments on the BRION report the week Brion resigned for an assurance that this report will remain at this title: Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-09-28/Technology report :-) --seav (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]