The Signpost

Discussion report

Discussion report for this week

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Hiding

The science of editing

Between them, Wikipedia:Editing scientific articles and {{ESCA}} have managed to create a fair amount of drama across Wikipedia in the last couple of days. A lengthy thread at the incidents noticeboard discussed whether User:Count Iblis was intentionally spamming Template:ESCA onto the talk pages of a number of physics articles. The page itself quickly received the attention of a number of editors, and a consensus was reached that Wikipedia:Editing scientific articles was not a guideline and was in conflict with Wikipedia:No original research. A consensus to delete Template:Esca also seems emergent at templates for discussion.

New proposals

Deletion round-up

Polls

Administrative notices

Briefly

Requests for comment

Sixteen Requests for comment have been made in the week of 2 November to 8 November:

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.
No comments yet. Yours could be the first!







       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0