Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/In the media
The Wikimedia Foundation's engineering report for December 2011 was published last week on the Wikimedia Techblog and on the MediaWiki wiki, giving an overview of all Foundation-sponsored technical operations in that month. The three projects of particular note (WebFonts, Visual Editor, and ArticleFeedback version 5) were covered in the previous issues of The Signpost; however, the report did contain several items of note that were not.
The report contained updates on a number of events fixed for January and February: the San Francisco hackathon (21–22 January 2012, an "outreach-focused" weekend aimed at developers, with activities focusing on "mobile, the web-accessible API and our framework for JavaScript feature development", with 70 registrations at the time of writing); a similar hackathon in Pune, India (10–12 February 2012, with about 70 participants expected and a focus on "the gadgets framework, mobile Wikimedia access, and internationalization"), and GLAMcamp DC (10–12 February 2012, a GLAM conference with a technical track focussing on "mass upload and analytics functionality"). Elsewhere, more projects have taken up residence within the Wikimedia Labs infrastructure; and two new projects have joined the list of WMF-sponsored proposals: one to improve GPS storage and retrieval, a "critical component of the mobile projects [that] will replace our existing use of GeoNames.org and can also supplement GeoHack", and a second to "expose featured articles, In the news, and other main page content" via RSS feed, such that "our partners can better re-use our data".
Managing the release cycle for any software is difficult, and with a geographically distributed, part-volunteer contributor base this is even more the case. This week, a code "slush" was called to help temporarily simplify matters ahead of the branching of 1.19 (wikitech-l mailing list). The move closes the central repository to major changes, allowing time for code reviewers to catch up on the backlog before a release snapshot ("branch") is taken later in the month. After branching, the repository will be opened to major code changes and additions again, while the branch will receive only bug fixes.
In previous versions, branching had been performed relatively early, opening up the central repository to changes earlier, but this has proved "hard to manage", according to Brion Vibber, the Foundation's lead software architect. The pre-branch code "slush" (essentially a code freeze but with greater discretion) is likely to focus minds on code review, which has been lagging until relatively recently. If it proves insufficient, further code freezes may be required; these would help contribute to greater levels of testing at a small cost in terms of the level of active development undertaken.
Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Opinion
The Wikimedia Foundation is the only leading online entity to sustain itself entirely on donations. The Foundation's annual fundraiser is its biggest single source of income, having grown with the project since early efforts from 2004 and 2003. This year, a goal of $20M was set (up from $16M last year), making up the bulk of the Foundation's $28.3M 2011–12 budget.
As with last year's drive, this year's event kicked off with Jimbo Wales' "personal appeal", which consistently received the highest feedback in previous drives and it has again this year (see previous Signpost coverage), with a new green banner curiously gathering increased contributions. The appeals featured then shifted their focus to the community, turning the spotlight on appeals from individual Wikimedians over the past few weeks.
That effort concluded successfully this week, with the $20M goal reached on 2 January 2012. According to Sue Gardner, who graced the CentralNotice banner for some time following the windfall, "Ordinary people use Wikipedia and they like it, so they chip in some cash so it will continue to thrive. That maintains our independence and lets us focus solely on providing a useful public service ... I promise them we will use their money carefully and well."
Although the average donor contribution has remained steady, the number of contributors has been rapidly expanding, increasing ten-fold since 2008.
What will the money be spent on? The 2011–12 annual financial plan outlines operating costs through mid-2012, with $12.4M (44%) going to tech support, $6.9M (24%) to finance and administration, $6.5M (23%) to special programs, $2.2M (8%) to fundraising, and $300K (1%) to governance.
The Sakha language Wikipedia reached the 8,000-article mark three minutes before the New Year, at the conclusion of a "Marathon 8,000", announced just two days before the year ended. At the time, the wiki needed just 102 articles to achieve this milestone; nonetheless, organizers stressed quality over quantity in the drive, and aimed to attract the Sakha-speaking community to contribute to the Sakha Wikipedia, one of the few international projects that supports the Sakha language online. Despite the short timeframe, Marathon 8,000 proved successful, with a sum total of 109 new articles written within two days.
The Sakha Wikipedia's Bureaucrat, Nikolai Pavlov, advertised the campaign in his and his friends' blogs and in announcements in the forums on Ykt.ru, the most popular news and forums portal of Yakutsk, the capital of the Sakha Republic. In the announcements he appealed to regular Sakha-speaking web surfers and called them to join Wikipedia in their language and to get their children to write, too. Surprisingly, just a few hours after publishing, the moderator of the forums removed the notices as inappropriate, putting the whole campaign in danger. The posts were restored after a personal request from the organizers; Pavlov said that he is sure that this was not an intentional disruption, but a misunderstanding and that he is confident that Ykt.ru will keep supporting the project, as it has done since its first steps.
The response to the campaign was immediate: dozens of editors, many of whom had never edited Wikipedia before, created new articles. The 8,000th article was about Mylajyn (Мылаадьын), a Sakha soldier in the Russian Civil War. Another marker of the campaign's success was that 1 and 2 January saw 20 new articles created by the new writers, an increase from normal levels and an "aftershock" of the campaign.
According to the Marathon's rules, the three winners are awarded an honorary title (in Sakha, "Марафон 8000 кыайыылааҕа"), and are entitled to display a badge on their user page as well as a framed certificate and a prize. The final results of the contest will be announced by 14 January.
Wikimedia UK hosted a workshop this past weekend for Wikimedia OTRS volunteers which was attended by a number of active OTRS agents and one OTRS admin. OTRS volunteers handle e-mails sent to the various e-mail addresses for different Wikimedia projects, and their work includes answering questions and concerns from readers, BLP issues, complaints about copyright and permissions to reuse images and text. At the event, a variety of issues with the current OTRS setup were discussed including how to improve governance of the OTRS system, improving the somewhat infuriating interface, recruiting more active Wikimedians to participate in OTRS, and better handling of difficult or angry people e-mailing the community.
Difficulties faced by OTRS users include handling cross-wiki issues like notability or BLP policies on different language versions of Wikipedia and explaining international copyright policies to correspondents. Better training and mentoring of OTRS volunteers is something that people at the workshop have committed to, as well as considering how practical it would be to try to institute a requirement that e-mails be responded to in under seven days.
The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) hosted a dozen Wikimedians this past week for a NARA ExtravaSCANza at their College Park, Maryland facility. The ExtravaSCANza was organized by Dominic McDevitt-Parks, the National Archives Wikipedian-in-Residence, culminating his 8-month stint at NARA.
In the evening on Wednesday, January 4, Wikimedians scanned NASA photos. The focus on Thursday was women’s suffrage and rights. On Friday and Saturday, Wikimedians worked on photos of Chile, along with battleship photos on Saturday. Wikimedians also helped out with the FedFlix project, digitizing videos, and experimenting with sound recordings. Highlights include radio broadcasts that encouraged Americans to answer questions from census-takers for the 1940 United States Census. Photos are being uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, and help is needed to categorize them.
Although NARA will be without a Wikipedian-in-Residence in the months ahead, collaborations will continue, including more scan-a-thon events.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/In focus
The Arbitration Committee opened no new cases this week, and closed no cases, leaving four open.
A proposed decision was posted by arbitrator Kirill Lokshin on 3 January. The proposed principles included a discussion of community sanctions and recidivism. A large amount of discussion by arbitrators has centered around the remedy and the restrictions to be imposed on Betacommand. Proposals have ranged from a one year ban to offering Betacommand a clean start. No remedy has received a majority of support as of publication.
This open case, which has already attracted a great deal of attention (see previous Signpost coverage), entered its second week of evidence submissions. A total of 39 editors have submitted evidence, totalling more than 270 diffs. Due to the complexity of the case, arbitrator Risker has suggested extending the evidence deadline to 15 January (next Sunday). In parallel with the great deal of evidence, 21 users have offered proposals on the workshop page.
The current date set for the posting of a proposed decision is 26 January.
This case is moving towards the workshop phase, with the first-ever public posting of an arbitrator's viewpoints during the case itself. Drafter AGK posted this summary which contained his view as to what a final decision should look like. "In the decision", AGK wrote, "we will give some guidance to the disputants for engaging in similar content disputes in the future, and we will sanction a small number of [disruptive] editors." However, he cautioned that a decision on the inclusion (or not) of Muhammad images would remain subject to resolution by "the wider community". A discussion of the summary then began on the workshop talk page.
Wednesday January 11 is the deadline for evidence submissions.
This open case is close to the posting of a proposed decision by one of the drafters. Arbitrator Roger Davies wrote on the workshop talk page that a proposed decision will be posted in the coming days. He indicated that the proposal will eventually be opened for "public comment" before the start of voting.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-01-09/Humour