As articulated by the last editor-in-chief Jarry1250 in his outgoing address, The Signpost aspires to evolve beyond mere transmission of news, to challenging and provocative treatments of issues of importance to the English Wikipedia and the associated infosphere.
Alas, of late, many areas of interest on which we'd like to deliver high-quality coverage are underserved by our current volunteer resources, and in recent months, maintaining quality of service in the most basic reports has been a struggle. For this week's edition, this shortfall in manpower unfortunately resulted in us having to drop the 'News and notes' section.
This is a call for fellow Wikipedians to help us ensure The Signpost can be as consistently excellent and ambitious as its readership deserves. Are you a keen follower of the topics The Signpost covers, capable of thinking critically while writing objectively about those topics? If so, we ask for you to step forward now. Areas of potential contribution are as follows:
Other news beats, such as Featured content, the WikiProject report, the Arbitration report, and the Technology report, tend to be comparatively well served, but could always use further assistance and review.
The bulk of The Signpost is compiled weekly by a half a dozen volunteers from an editing community of thousands. Imagine what we could accomplish with two dozen.
Thank you for your continued support,
Skomorokh and SMasters (managing editors)
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Traffic report
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/In the media
This week, The Wikimedia Foundation launched its first ever coding challenge, inviting outside coders to assist in the development of MediaWiki, the software behind Wikipedia and other Wikimedia wikis (wikitech-l mailing list: 1, 2; Wikimedia blog: 1, 2). Described as an "experiment" by Deputy Director Erik Möller, the well-advertised challenge takes the form of three separate contests: to allow mobile media uploading; to "surface change in real time" in order to make Wikipedia feel more "alive"; and to create a modern, high quality image slideshow feature for Wikipedia articles.
The challenge, which utilises a special 'Contest' extension built by Jeroen de Dauw, is being conducted with the help of Greg DeKoenigsberg, formerly a Senior Community Architect at Red Hat. The contest is backed by a free ticket to a 2012 event of the winner's choice (such as Wikimania 2012) as well as non-monetary benefits in the form of "certificates of coding excellence" designed to be "a great addition to anyone's CV".
In his presentation of the contest to the Wikimedia community, DeKoenigsberg wrote that the idea of a contest may turn out to "be brilliant, or it may not... offering a big prize for challenge winners may be a master stroke, or it may be a terrible mistake. The contest may yield lots of smart developers or lots of clueless noobs. ... I have no idea what to expect, and I'm not about to pretend otherwise. I will be fascinated to see how the next few weeks play out". He also paid tribute to the MediaWiki developer community in expectation of the "helpfulness and patience" he knew the competition organisers could rely on.
| “ | What if we could get amazing people to demonstrate their skills against concrete challenges, and use the completed challenges as the first evaluation screen for all candidates -- rather than their CVs? We'd still look at the CV, but at the end of the day, we’re looking for amazing, brilliant, dedicated people who will deliver excellent results. | ” |
| — Erik Möller, contributing to the Weekend of Code MediaWiki page | ||
Early indications seem to be promising. Less than 24 hours after the start of the challenge, the Wikimedia blog reported that 500 contestants from 80 countries had already signed up to participate; submissions must be made by 9 November.
These figures will no doubt cheer DeKoenigsberg, as well as the wider Foundation engineering department. It is hoped that the model of micro-involvement on show in the challenge could provide a useful insight into the pool of talented international developers who might consider working for the Foundation in the future. Indeed, at this moment in time, there seems to have been little said against the trial, which is being conducted in the spirit of nothing ventured, nothing gained when it comes to generating the diverse and expanded MediaWiki developer community needed for Wikimedia wikis to reach their full potential.
Wikimedia Deutschland announced this week that it has officially begun hiring eleven members of staff to work on its Wikidata project. The project would see a central data repository created to hold interwiki links. If successful, further stages would allow for a shared infobox repository, as well as a remote interface to generate up-to-date lists.
According to a post on the wikitech-l mailing list, the German chapter is hoping to secure "world-class" talent to turn their detailed proposal into reality. A shared data repository has been on the wishlist for many years (see, for example, Signpost coverage from August 2010) as a way of enabling cross-wiki updates to common facts and figures. At the very least, a central interwiki repository would drastically cut the amount of maintenance required when trying to map the links between articles on different wikis.
Wikimedia Deutschland described the Wikidata project as "new and ambitious ..., [a] project that aims to change the Web once again", and the news that it is actually happening will no doubt buoy the spirits of those who thought that the time for big, structural changes to Wikimedia wikis had passed. Likewise, Lead Software Architect Brion Vibber and Director of Features Engineering Alolita Sharma have both since commented on the news to signal their excitement at the project.
Of course, the eagerly anticipated project is also likely to be monitored closely by chapters around the world, and its success or failure could drastically effect whether or not they too choose to take on large technical challenges of this sort in future. As such, the project will also contribute to the continual debate about whether or not MediaWiki's reliance on WMF "head office" support for major engineering projects is justified in the medium-to-long term.
Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Opinion Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/News and notes Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/In focus
Activity was low this week with only one case remaining open, Abortion, which saw a very modest amount of activity in the workshop. A request for amendment on the Climate Change case seems to have soaked up what limited activity there was this week; continue following The Signpost for coverage of the outcome, probably next week.
Arbitration enforcement was as dramatic as usual, but otherwise unremarkable. Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-10-24/Humour
