The Signpost
Single-page Edition
WP:POST/1
18 April 2011

News and notes
Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
In the news
Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
WikiProject report
An audience with the WikiProject Council
Features and admins
The best of the week
Arbitration report
Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
Technology report
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/In the media


2011-04-18

Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Jarry1250 and Tilman Bayer

Two MediaWiki releases, but neither of them 1.17

On Tuesday (12 April), MediaWiki version 1.16.3 was officially released to external sites (Wikimedia Techblog). It included a group of three security fixes that had already gone live to Wikimedia sites, which are running a pre-release version of 1.17:

After the release, however, it soon became clear that the first of the three issues had not been entirely cleared up, prompting the second release of the week, MediaWiki 1.16.4, on Friday (15 April) (Wikimedia Techblog, wikitech-l mailing list). The updates also took advantage of recent localisation efforts in order to provide users with an interface translated into their own language.

In related news, no official date has yet been set for a release candidate of MediaWiki 1.17, the version WMF wikis are currently running. A beta version is expected "probably next week", however, according to developer Tim Starling, who is overseeing the release effort (also wikitech-l). The accompanying discussion also included calls to "branch" version 1.18 within the next fortnight. Branching would separate a snapshot of the software from the developmental bleeding edge version of the MediaWiki software (also known as "trunk"), allowing it to be stabilised, tested and released in the next few months.

In brief

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Opinion


2011-04-18

Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news

The ten millionth upload to Wikimedia Commons

Commons reaches ten million files

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/In focus


2011-04-18

Case comes to a close after 3 weeks – what does the decision tell us?

The Arbitration Committee opened no new cases but closed one case. One case is currently open.

Open cases

During the week, several arbitrators submitted proposals, some of which will form part of the final decision. Other proposals are likely to be submitted in the coming week.

Closed case

Noleander (Week 3)

This case was opened after a number of divisive noticeboard discussions involving allegations of misrepresentation of sources, as well as tendentious and antisemitic editing. 19 editors submitted on-wiki evidence, and several users submitted proposals in the workshop. Drafter Newyorkbrad also submitted a full proposed decision in the workshop which attracted input from arbitrators, parties and others. A total of 14 arbitrators voted in the case before the case came to a close today.

What is the effect of the decision and what does it tell us?
  • Users are reminded that the terms which were recently adopted in the Race and intelligence case (see motion below) are applicable to other disputes similar to those arising in this case.
  • Noleander (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic-banned from making any edit relating to Judaism, the Jewish people, Jewish history or culture, or individual Jewish persons identified as such, broadly but reasonably construed, anywhere on Wikipedia.
    • Noleander may request that it be terminated or modified after at least one year has elapsed. The Committee will give significant weight to whether Noleander has established an ability to edit collaboratively and in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines in other topic-areas of the project. Any perceptibly biased or prejudiced editing concerning any other group would weigh against lifting of the topic-ban and could result in further sanctions.
  • An editor must not engage in a pattern of editing that focuses on a specific racial, religious, or ethnic group and can reasonably be perceived as as evincing bias in favor of or against the members of the group. Article content must be presented from a neutral point of view and the contents of source materials must be presented accurately and fairly. Contributors who engage in tendentious or disruptive editing, such as by engaging in sustained aggressive point-of-view editing or repeatedly misusing sources to favor a particular view, may be banned from the articles in question or from the site.
  • Editors are expected to refrain from making unnecessary references to the actual or perceived racial, religious, or ethnic background of fellow editors. Such references should be made only if they clearly serve a legitimate purpose. In the context of a noticeboard discussion or dispute resolution, it will rarely serve a valid purpose to seek to classify the participants in the discussion on this basis.

Motion

  • Race and intelligence case - a motion drafted by arbitrator Roger Davies was passed to replace one of the case remedies. Consequently, "standard" discretionary sanctions from the case were broadened to be applicable to: any edit relating to the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, broadly construed, anywhere on Wikipedia. All contributors to articles in the newly defined area of conflict were reminded of the contentious nature of this subject and were cautioned that to avoid disruption, they must adhere strictly to fundamental Wikipedia policies.


Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2011-04-18/Humour

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0