The Signpost
Single-page Edition
WP:POST/1
23 April 2007

Robdurbar
Administrator goes rogue, is blocked
Brandt unblock
Wales unblocks Brandt, then reverses himself
Wikidetainment
Historian detained after his Wikipedia article is vandalized
RFA reform
Efforts to reform Requests for Adminship spark animated discussion
Pat Binns
Canadian politician the subject of an edit war
Virginia Tech
Virginia Tech massacre articles rise to prominence
Back in China
Wikipedia enters China one disc at a time
WikiWorld
WikiWorld comic: "Buttered cat paradox"
News and notes
News and notes: Unreferenced biographies, user studies, milestones
In the news
Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins
Features and admins
Arbitration report
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/From the editors Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Traffic report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/In the media Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Technology report Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Essay Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Opinion

2007-04-23

News and notes

Contribute   —  
Share this
By Ral315 and Remember

Unreferenced biographies under scrutiny

After continued concerns about the dismal quality of certain unreferenced articles about living people, Messedrocker has compiled, through an analysis of article categories, a list of over 16,000 articles on living persons that do not completely cite their sources. The list is divided into 17 sub-pages; users are encouraged to review uncited statements, attempt to find sources or remove uncited, controversial statements, and correctly tag articles.

Wikipedia user studies continue

The WikiProject Vandalism studies recently finished its first study and has published its conclusions (a full and detailed copy can be found here).

The first study analyzed a randomly sampled pool of 100 random articles. Within these 100 articles there were a total of 668 edits during the months of November 2004, 2005, and 2006. Of those 668 edits, 31 (or 4.64%) were a vandalism of some type. The study's salient findings suggest that in a given month approximately 5% of edits are vandalism and 97% of that vandalism is done by anonymous editors. Obvious vandalism is the vast majority of vandalism used. From the data gathered within this study it is also found that roughly 25% of vandalism reverting is done by anonymous editors and roughly 75% is done by wikipedians with user accounts. The mean average time vandalism reverting is 758.35 minutes (12.63 hours), a figure that may be skewed by outliers. The median time vandalism reverting is 14 minutes.

The planned second study is in a developmental stage; details relating to the study, which will involve a larger sample size, are being planned.

Meanwhile, one of the few user surveys of Wikipedians, conducted in 2005 and originally available only in German, was translated into English recently.

Briefly

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Serendipity Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Op-ed Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/In focus

2007-04-23

The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Contribute   —  
Share this
By David Mestel

The Arbitration Committee opened four cases this week, and closed no cases.

New cases

Evidence phase

Voting phase

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-04-23/Humour

If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.



       

The Signpost · written by many · served by Sinepost V0.9 · 🄯 CC-BY-SA 4.0