Florence Devouard, or Anthere, has served on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees since June 2004, and as Chair of the Board since October 2006. In her position as Chair, Devouard is responsible for overseeing many of the affairs of the Foundation. She also serves as an unofficial liaison between the Board and the community. The Signpost interviews Florence Devouard this week:

---

Colored version

Wikipedia Signpost: As Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation, what is your official role, and what actions do you take in an official capacity?

Florence Devouard: According to the bylaws, my (theoretical) role (beside being a board member) is

"The Chair shall, when present, preside at all meetings of the Board of Trustees. The Chair shall have general supervision of the affairs of the corporation and shall make reports to the Board of Trustees at meetings and other times as necessary to keep Trustees informed of corporation activities <...> The Chair shall in general perform all duties as from time to time may be assigned to them by the Board of Trustees."

This is the theory. Now, what is the practice? I very much view my role as being a facilitator of the activities of the board. I try to encourage the board in strategic planning, helping Board to take actions, with respect to our priorities and governance concerns. Along with Sue Gardner, I set up the agenda of board meetings, chair these meetings, make sure the decisions are properly recorded through resolutions and minutes (We held 4 main, face-to-face board meetings since january 2007).

Depending on what needs to be worked on, I suggest the creation of workforces or committees (for example, the audit committee, the ED evaluation committee, the treasurer search group...). I serve ex officio on all board committees. I also try to make sure that board members get the information needed to set policies and evaluate the job done by the staff. And of course, I discuss issues with Sue to better estimate what our priorities are, so that both board and staff work together to achieve the organization's mission.

Last, the chair must be particularly involved in the evaluation of the performance of the Executive Director, in the evaluation of the overall performance of the organization, and at least informally, evaluate the effectiveness of the board members.

Contrariwise to what I hear often when I travel around, my job is not to control and validate all articles. I am not joking! You would not believe the number of people asking me if that's my job :-)

WS: What do you do outside your official role? (i.e. Press, community, and anything else you do that isn't really in your job description)

FD: I have been over three years on the board now, and a year as chair. In the first two years, I had more time for non official jobs. Today, I do not have a lot of free time.

My first year as chair has been real tough, as a good part of it was without any executive director. So, during the past year, I had to (along with other board members) assume part of that role. From a governance perspective, it is not a good idea, but we had no other choice in the interim period. It was also very tiring. I am glad this time is behind us :-)

Now that Sue has been hired, I have a bit more free time to do other things. I spend a significant part of my time with the press (mostly in France. For example, last week, I answered to possibly 10 journalists on the phone and I went once on television for the follow-up off the French lawsuit. I also spend a lot of time in conferences, workshops etc... I also try to go to some of the meetings organized by the chapters (such as most recently, the Dutch chapter meeting, reported in wikinews).

Last, I still edit the projects from time to time, often anonymously :-)

WS: What is the current status of the Wikimedia Foundation's audit? When do you expect a public release of financial statements for FY2007?

FD: The audit officially began on September 17, 2007. It is expected to be finished by the end of the calendar year (hopefully).

The audit is being conducted by a St. Petersburg firm called Gregory Sharer and Stuart. This is the same firm that conducted our ‘first-three-years’ audit report that was published last year.

On the Wikimedia side, the people involved are Oleta McHenry, preparing the books on behalf of the Foundation. Mona Venkateswaran, a financial consultant to the Foundation and a former auditor, is providing oversight and guidance to Oleta. Various others are helping Oleta by providing information and/or supporting documentation. We are also now actively looking for a new treasurer.

It is hard to plan completion date. It depends on the size of the organization, number of transactions, inherent risk in the audit work, and overall complexity of performing audit procedures. It’s fairly normal for audits to take longer to complete than was initially predicted. The Foundation’s projects (and their popularity) grew significantly over the past year, which meant that spending (number of transactions) increased. So there is more work to be done. Also, there has been some turnover in Foundation staff (e.g., the accountant), which has resulted in some loss of institutional memory that makes it harder to do the audit preparation. So it isn’t really all that surprising that the audit is fairly time-consuming.

WS: After the office relocation is completed, what do you think the Foundation's next big priority should be?

FD: It is impossible to limit one self to one priority...the main urgent priorities (beside relocation) are the ongoing fundraising and getting the audit done.

Last year, I indicated that the first priority of the Foundation was (re)organization, so that it could become sustainable. Much as been done already and I expect that the next six months will mostly be dedicated to further strengthening the new organization.

At the staff level, the biggest challenge for the few coming months will be to replace those of our staff members who are unfortunately not moving to San Francisco, as well as expand the staff. This has been delayed for too long and as you are probably aware, we are currently hiring! The challenge will probably not so much be to find people, as I am sure many will be excited by the opportunity to work for the Wikimedia Foundation. The challenge is that we will have many new people at the same time, most of them probably not from the community. They will need to learn very quickly our values.

Purely at the board level, the priority is to find a new treasurer for the board.

Other priorities for the coming year are license issues, strenghtening the Wikimedia network (relations with chapters, affiliates), developing financial controls, increasing and diversifying revenue streams, promoting less developped languages, and .... quality, quality, quality :-)

WS: Today, what do you think are the Wikimedia Foundation's strengths? What are its weaknesses? How can these be improved?

FD: People and good will are probably the biggest strengths.

I would currently consider understaffing the biggest weakness. We probably miss many great opportunities to do big and important things, due to lack of time. I expect this will be improved soon, when more staff is hired. However, the success of the fundraising will also determine our future hiring ability. And as I wrote above, new staff will need help from community members to understand what we are doing :-)

WS: What do you think is the public's biggest misconception about the Wikimedia Foundation and its projects? How do you think we can remedy this?

FD: In January 2007, I defined as one of my priorities the following message: we are not a commercial project. By and large, the public, the corporate world, the NGOs and governmental organizations had no idea what Wikimedia Foundation was about, and considered Wikipedia was held by a private commercial company.

As could be expected, such a belief raises questions (doubts...) about our (hidden) intents, about our independence etc...

For this reason, in 2007, a lot of efforts have been put to explain that we are a non profit, that wikimedia projects are here for the common good, etc. I can already see much improvement, not so much in the public mind, but definitely at the level of big non-profit organizations, big private companies and governments.

A remedy to improve that further? Messaging... explaining what we do, how we do it, why we do it etc...everyone can help push this message: "We are a non profit, we want to bring knowledge to people". I would also consider getting one big grant a very cool way to show the public where we stand.

WS: On a similar note, what do you think is the community's biggest misconception about the Foundation, and how do you believe it can be remedied?

FD: The editors least involved simply have NO idea there IS a Foundation. To a certain extent, I think that's fine. What is important is that they understand our mission, our principles and the fact we are not commercial, and that we are relying on donations.

Considering the number of emails I get from various people, I guess many editors also do not fully understand the difference between staff and board, and what the role of each is. These two pages may help them:

• Board, COO, CEO
• The role of a board member

I guess we need to work on an organigram...

WS: You've gone on a few trips and conferences to promote Wikimedia. What was your favorite moment from these trips?

FD: I had several great experiences and precious memories. Let me tell you about the last one.

Last week, I was in Livingstone, Zambia. The World Agricultural Information Systems Project had been tasked by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to identify priority information needs of farm smallholders and their support network with special emphasis on the needs of women, in Africa and South Asia, then explore the application of new technologies to the "first kilometre" problems of communities of smallholders accessing up to date and relevant information; and last, to understand the institutional, economic and social context in which smallholders operate as a broader context for effective smallholder development.

The project consisted in two field trips and two international workshops. I was invited to participate to the second workshop, in Zambia. Participants were very diverse in expertise and in origins, and we shared fabulous experiences during the whole week. The outcome of the week was the production of 15-20 practical (well, some were practical, some were a bit more theoretical...) actions to help poor farmers in Africa and South Asia.

My group designed an action plan which would have as a goal, the development of online collaborative freely-licensed content modules that can be aggregated into handbooks, textbooks and other support materials for agricultural education & extension.

During this workshop, we had the opportunity to go and visit a village of 35 households, about 20mn away from Livingstone. The experience was eye-opening. It is one thing to hear about poverty on television, or to read about it in newspapers, this is entirely something else to see it and to talk to the farmers. Of 35 households, only 10 produce sufficient agricultural goods to be able to sell some of it and purchase other things. All others are just survivors. AIDS prevalence: 18%. This village had no electricity, they enjoyed clean water though, but at 1.5 km away. About half of the farmers had a radio system, working on batteries. A few of them had cell phones. There was a school in the village, 2 km away from most houses. The school was made of two buildings, inside which I could see only a few low banks and a black board. Nothing else. We also visited the "village information center". It was just a small house. Entirely empty. Because they have basically nothing to put inside, or if they do, books and leaflets can disappear since there is no glass window or door.

I have not uploaded yet all pictures, but you may find some of those here.

It is *really* hard to begin to imagine the life of these people. You could get all the cliches, the kids playing with an empty bottle of the coca you just brought them, the torn clothes, the chicken running around, the mosquitoes vibrating, the sticky eyes. But then you also have all the stories about the elephants ruining the culture. The mill, 7 km away, too far for the women to be really useful, the unique bicycle in a corner to bring the news to Livingstone, the request for a football balloon, so that the teenager boys could play football rather than going after the girls. The farmers were trying to set up a little intensive chicken battery-type system.

Whilst we were all seating together and talking about ways they thought we could most help them, I realized how painfully in lack of information they were. Oh, we are not even talking of an encyclopedia here. But simply stuff like booklets to teach them fertilization, handbook on a particular crop, videos to learn better disease management; SMS messages to tell them about the weather; community-based radio to communicate marketplace information. All this could be useful, but it is so far away from what we seem to be doing right now. One also fully understand the benefit of a free-license. In those places, no one can really easily access information on the net. Even in the four star hotel where we were lodged, internet was a looooong way to be reliable. However, small businesses could develop around printing leaflets in the nearby internet cafe, transporting the docs to the village by bicycle, and selling them at very low cost to the village extension officer. It is not only about bringing information to people, but also helping local business to develop.

My favorite moment on this trip perhaps was when we realized that one of the villagers was taking written notes of the discussions. When we asked why, he proudly answered he was the community journalist and had been trained to do so. He takes notes and travel to Livingstone so as to provide his notes to the local newspaper, and then bring back the journal to the village. What was he most dreaming for? A bicycle and a camera. So that he could better report on the village life.

WS: How do you feel the current fundraiser is going? Are there any current plans to team up with large donors or corporate organizations, either through matching funds donations or individual donations, during this drive?

FD: The fundraiser began October 23 and runs until December 23. In its first 25 days, we brought in USD 708K. If we continue to receive donations at the same average rate of ~28K per day, we will total just a little more than 1m in donations by December 23. However, we have at least two commitments for major donations expected, matching donation type. Some more in the works.

Change in the sitenotice (more attention-grabbing, brighter, bolder) made a significant visible change. Therefore, we continue to make small changes/improvements, with the hope of maintaining people's interest and keeping donations. Some communication initiatives are also planned before the end of the fundraiser (new fundraising landing pages, more translations, bloggers outreach, information package for big donors, fundraising blog, more press releases, Edit Wikipedia Week, holidays gift certificates etc...).

My suggestion for a full fundraising report would be for the Signpost to interview Sue Gardner for an update on this very topic for the anniversary of one-month-fundraiser (<---- is not that cool ? I am setting up next week SignPost agenda)

But overall, my personal feeling is that it is not terribly successful. Though I do not have any actual figures to support this, I fear that the current pretty bad financial situation in the USA is impacting our fundraiser. My hope is that all the ongoing initiatives will in particular catch the attention of big donors.

WS: Is there anything specific you want to say to the community?

FD: I would simply recommend keeping the goal in mind. Bringing knowledge/information to as many people as possible. Sometimes, we get lost in details, or slightly useless debates, or endless disagreements on petty issues. It may be over the creation of a list or over the fine print on a contract, or the ending date of a vote, or whether to block a low-profile vandal. We should try to keep in mind the big picture.

I'd love us to spend more time working with these kids' future in mind than writing to the New York Times for the zillionth time, to fix a little license detail.

Another case has come up of Wikipedia content appearing, unattributed, in a prominent external publication, this time a book from John Wiley & Sons. The publisher has issued a statement acknowledging the situation and said it would change or correct any future editions of the book.

The book in question is Black Gold: The New Frontier in Oil for Investors, by George Orwel. Published in June 2006, the book includes on pages 80-81 a description of the Khobar Towers bombing, which it turns out significantly resembles the Wikipedia article on the subject. The publisher said Orwel had assured the company this was unintentional; asked about it personally by the New York Times, Orwel adopted the publisher's statement as speaking for him as well.

The matter was first noticed by Gabi S., who said she had been reading Orwel's book and incidentally found the copying. Two weeks ago, Gabi S. alerted Ydorb, whom she identified as the primary author of the passage. On his user page, Ydorb includes a statement releasing all his contributions into the public domain, so an argument exists that the situation does not involve actual copyright infringement by Orwel. The more serious issue therefore is one of research and scholarship, where longstanding principles require attribution of material from other sources.

As Ydorb pointed out, "Even if this is legally not a copyright violation, it is an ethical problem for an established reporter." Wiley effectively acknowledged this in its statement, saying it took the situation "very seriously." Acknowledging that mistakes could happen, the publisher continued, "When they happen, we appreciate being alerted and do what is necessary to rectify any problems." Wiley said it would make corrections in future reprints of the book, and also change the currently available e-book version.

To document the copying, Ydorb has put together a comparison of the book excerpt with the Wikipedia article. The bulk of the copied text was added by Ydorb in a single edit on 30 June 2004. The closest to what actually appears in the book is a revision from 31 December 2005. A subsequent review of the Wikipedia article by Kaldari concluded that Ydorb had written six paragraphs of the copied text, while a handful of other contributors had added a sentence or two. A careful comparison will reveal some editorial changes in the text, but for the copying to take place in early 2006 seems consistent with the book's publication schedule.

Several previous cases of plagiarism from Wikipedia have been reported, appearing in several different press sources. In some of these, especially where investigations identified several instances of plagiarism tracing to multiple origins, the individuals involved were forced out of their jobs. However, this may be the first case of unattributed Wikipedia content appearing in a book from a major publisher.

Since it makes little sense to fire the author of a book, the prospect of corrections in future editions may be all that results from this incident. Orwel was previously a reporter as well for the Dow Jones Newswires agency. His publisher lists him as currently being a writer and analyst for two oil industry trade publications. Ydorb did raise the issue of whether anybody has checked the book for other possible instances of plagiarism, but so far nobody has addressed that question.

This week's WikiWorld comic uses text from "Raining animals". The comic is released under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5 license for use on Wikipedia and elsewhere.

Page patrolling has been enabled for Special:Newpages. The feature, active for all users registered for at least 4 days, allows users to mark new pages as patrolled, meaning that they're either appropriate pages, have been tagged with appropriate maintenance templates, or tagged for speedy deletion. A log is also available to provide oversight as to who made specific tagging decisions on any given page.

Nominations for the December 2007 Arbitration Committee Elections remained open this week. This week, Alexia Death, Danny, John Reaves, and Mercury nominated themselves for the position. Meanwhile, NHRHS2010 and Phil Sandifer withdrew from the election, and Messedrocker and Cbrown1023 were forced to withdraw due to a new age requirement for the position, bringing the number of candidates in the election back to 27.

This age requirement is the result of discussion on the private Arbitration Committee's mailing list. Candidates must be both 18 years of age, and of legal age in their jurisdiction. This requirement was added, according to arbitrator James Forrester, because:

It is the considered consensus of the Arbitration Committee that our working practices are incompatible with having a minor as a member of the Committee, and that any changes to facilitate this would be impractical and severely damage the effectiveness of the Arbitrators. Specifically, a minor could not take part in discussion of or even be shown privileged information, including that sourced from the CheckUser and OverSight tools, without violating the confines of the Foundation's privacy policy and related terms which govern our practices. This is a significant part of the work of the Committee, and would result in, at best, a two-tier Arbitration Committee with some members unable to participate in, or even be aware of, most of the activity.

Of the five current arbitrators, only Raul654 will stand for re-election. Fred Bauder, Mackensen, Neutrality and SimonP have all indicated they will not run for another term. These five seats will expire in 2007; it has not yet been noted whether any other seats will be added or replaced.

The Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser continued this week. In the first four weeks of the fundraiser, about 25,200 people had donated at least US$1, and the Foundation had raised about $763,000.

The large bump realized from changing the sitenotice displayed at the top of all Wikimedia projects has since disappeared; November 19's donations reached a fundraiser-low $17,522.75.

Large donations this fundraiser include a $10,000 donation by Michael Minor, and a $3,000 donation by Andrew MacMillan.

• Steward elections are set to commence on November 26. New stewards will be up for election, and current stewards will be up for re-confirmation. Among other requirements, stewards must be at least 18 years old, of legal age in their jurisdiction at the time the elections end (December 16), and must be willing to identify themselves to the Wikimedia Foundation. Prospective candidates can apply until the elections begin.
• The Aromanian Wikipedia has reached 1,000 articles.
• The Lithuanian Wiktionary has reached 10,000 articles.
• The Spanish Wikipedia has reached 300,000 articles.

Baidu's Censored Answer to Wikipedia - While Wikipedia, and especially its Chinese version, has been blocked from access in China almost continuously since 2006, the Chinese Internet search engine operator Baidu has developed its own collaborative online encyclopedia, the Baidu Baike. Critics have pointed out that Baidu Baike contains copyright violations, requires editors to register, moderates all contributions, and is censored in accordance with government sensitivities. Jimbo Wales has said that Wikipedia does not plan to take legal action against plagiarism of Wikipedia by Baidu. The success of Baidu Baike offers a glimpse of the situation facing Internet service companies operating in China: if they do not co-operate with the government, there are plenty of local companies which are willing to do so.

Dutch Justice Ministry blocks employees from using Wikipedia - The Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands has blocked its employees from accessing Wikipedia. The move follows a report by the magazine Intermediar which revealed that, based on IP address information, more than 800 entries had been edited from the ministry's computers. While some of the edits have been harmless, the ministry is concerned about employees making edits that are "tasteless or worse during working hours". The ministry imposed the temporary block on its 30,000 employees while its internal policies are reviewed.

Other recent mentions of Wikipedia in the news include:

• Librarian: 'Just say no to Wikipedia' - A middle school librarian in New Jersey has adopted the slogan "just say no" to discourage students from relying on Wikipedia for research.
• Encyclopedist’s Lair - Jimmy Wales tells the New York Times about his favourite possessions, travels, and Tajik hats.
• Hill leaving post as Davis press secretary - Following controversy over partisan Wikipedia edits in articles relating to his employer, Timothy Hill, the press secretary of US Representative David Davis, has resigned from his position.
• Web 2.0 gives power to the people - Jimmy Wales says that Web 2.0, a concept which includes successful web innovations such as Wikipedia, is an efficient way to drive innovation that can also benefit corporations.

WikiProject History is a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of any topic related to history. Its project page originally served as a general discussion forum for ideas on the style guidelines for articles within the project's scope. Currently, it has 74 members. In addition, any editors that are members of any of the history WikiProject's subprojects are also considered to be members.

The project was also recently expanded into wikibooks:Wikibooks:WikiProject History.

Serving as points-of-contact for any issues with the History project and taking care of the administrative and procedural aspects of the effort, the project's coordinators are Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) and Wandalstouring (talk · contribs). The project hopes that there will be an election for new project coordinators when it gains enough members.

• The assessment department rates unassessed historical articles and rates them on the project's quality and importance scales.
• The collaboration department organizes large efforts by multiple editors to improve historical articles.
• The project's review department carries out peer reviews of historical articles. It also carries out A-Class and Top-Class reviews on articles within WikiProject History's scope.
• The outreach department is a central location for reaching out to project members through welcome banners, newsletters, etc.

The subprojects of WikiProject history include:

• WikiProject European history
• WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
• WikiProject Military history
• WikiProject History of Science

If you are interested in helping the history project in its efforts, you can add your name to its members list, and/or help out one of its subprojects.

Twenty users were granted admin status via the Requests for Adminship process this week: Lid (nom), Nightscream (nom), Spellcast (nom), David D. (nom), EncycloPetey (nom), Herbythyme (nom), Rifleman 82 (nom), SebastianHelm (nom), Ioeth (nom), Gimmetrow (nom), TeaDrinker (nom), Geometry guy (nom), Emperor (nom), Bencherlite (nom), Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (nom), Canadian Paul (nom), Coren (nom), Oxymoron83 (nom), Acroterion (nom), and Random832 (nom).

Four bots or bot tasks were approved to begin operating this week: PxBot (task request), SoxBot (task request) (task request 2), RoboMaxCyberSem (task request), and BHGbot (task request).

Twenty-eight articles were promoted to featured status last week: Prince's Palace of Monaco (nom), Acrocanthosaurus (nom), American Black Vulture (nom), Javan Rhinoceros (nom), Poliomyelitis (nom), Treatment of multiple sclerosis (nom), Variegated Fairy-wren (nom), Joseph Priestley (nom), Society of the Song Dynasty (nom), Chew Stoke (nom), Oldham (nom), Thich Quang Duc (nom), Animaniacs (nom), Rob-B-Hood (nom), Body Count (album) (nom), Dream Days at the Hotel Existence (nom), Joey Santiago (nom), Thespis (opera) (nom), The World Is Not Enough (song) (nom), Yasser Arafat (nom), Golden plates (nom), Ian Chappell (nom), Stanley Cup (nom), Wales national rugby union team (nom), BioShock (nom), Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow (nom), Battle of Red Cliffs (nom), and USS Kentucky (BB-66) (nom).

Fourteen lists were promoted to featured status last week: List of Naruto manga volumes (nom), List of Carnivàle episodes (nom), Feeder discography (nom), List of Bristol Rovers F.C. managers (nom), Gillingham F.C. seasons (nom), NWA World Women's Championship (nom), Milestone home runs by Barry Bonds (nom), List of Australian Victoria Cross recipients (nom), Minutemen discography (nom), IWGP World Heavyweight Championship (nom), List of palms of the Caribbean (nom), List of municipalities in Lycoming County, Pennsylvania (nom), List of films that received the Golden Film (nom), and List of Silverchair awards (nom).

One Featured topic was promoted last week: Seasons of Lost (nom).

No portals or sounds were featured last week.

No articles were de-featured last week.

One picture was delisted this week: Image:PaintedBunting23.jpg (nom).

No lists, portals, topics, or sounds were de-featured last week.

The following featured articles were displayed last week on the Main Page as Today's featured article: Michael Jordan, Restoration of the Sistine Chapel frescoes, Halo: Combat Evolved, Oklahoma, Honoré de Balzac, Lung cancer, and Sophie Blanchard.

The following featured pictures were displayed last week on the Main Page as picture of the day: Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Terraforming of Mars, Pink Pimelea, Sitting Bull, Holoplatys, United States Homefront, and Neurons.

Seven pictures were promoted to featured status last week and are shown below.

• 
  Toledo (nom)
• 
  Magpie-goose (nom)
• 
  Fissure vent (nom)
• 
  First Chechen War (nom)
• 
  The School of Athens (nom)
• 
  Emperor Tamarin (nom)
• 
  Tugboat (nom)

This is a summary of recent technology and site configuration changes that affect the English Wikipedia. Note that not all changes described here are necessarily live as of press time; the English Wikipedia is currently running version 1.44.0-wmf.8 (f08e6b3), and changes to the software with a version number higher than that will not yet be active. Configuration changes and changes to interface messages, however, become active immediately.

• A bug was accidentally introduced that caused 0, Template:0, and similar names to be invalid page names, breaking uses of {{0}} across the wiki; this was fixed shortly afterwards. (r27448, bug 11958)

• Using a namespace of Media: in the {{#ifexist:}} parser function now checks if a media file (usually an image) by that name is available to be included (even if the image is on the Wikimedia Commons rather than locally on the English Wikipedia); this differs from a namespace of Image: in that that checks the image/media description page, rather than the image/media file itself, for existence. (r27460, bug 7985)
• The default signature (the signature that users use if they have not customised their signature) is now customisable by administrators (r27473, bug 11913); a separate customisable default signature was added for anonymous users (r27512, bug 11315). The relevant interface messages (which administrators can edit to change the default signature) are MediaWiki:Signature and MediaWiki:Signature-anon; at the time of writing, the signatures have been customized to Ais523 (talk) and 127.0.0.1 (talk) respectively (note that the signature for anonymous users links to their contributions rather than their userpage), with no hyphens included in the signature (they were added by an administrator and then removed again). This does not affect signatures customized in Special:Preferences using the 'Use raw signature' option (this option requires any links wanted to be entered manually in the 'Nickname' box).
• Indexing and software updates done to the checkuser extension allows for faster and more complete retrieval of IPs used by a user. Range scans now check for results size before running the actual scan to avoid large filesorts that timeout. A list of IPs used in the range will appear in such cases instead. (r27262).

• The 'patrolled edits' feature was enabled on the English Wikipedia for Special:Newpages only; this feature makes it possible for new-page patrollers to better balance their work by marking pages as having been checked ('patrolled'). This newly-enabled feature, and instructions on how to use it, is explained at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/patrolled pages; that page currently suggests patrolling a page when it's been tagged for speedy deletion, you've checked it and seen no issues, or you've checked it and either fixed all issues with the page or placed appropriate cleanup tags on it to mention what those problems are. The action of patrolling a page is logged at Special:Logs/patrol. The way that the feature was originally configured, only administrators could patrol pages; after a discussion, this has since been changed, so that any page created by an administrator or bot will be automatically patrolled, and other pages can be marked as patrolled by any 'autoconfirmed' user (i.e. a user who has had an account for over four days), apart from the creator of the page. (bug 12007)
• The AssertEdit extension was installed on all Wikimedia wikis, although it does not yet seem to be live/working. The extension allows a user (although it is most useful for bots) to request various checks on requests they make to the wiki; for instance, it's possible to request a check that a page exists before editing it, or to request a check that the user editing is a logged-in bot (e.g. a bot can tell the servers to refuse its edits if it gets logged out accidentally or is accidentally run on the wrong account).

• Internationalisation has been continuing as normal; help is always appreciated! See mw:Localisation statistics for how complete the translations of languages you know are, and post any updates to bugzilla or use Betawiki.

The Arbitration Committee accepted one new case this week, and closed two cases.

• Sadi Carnot: A case involving alleged POV-pushing by Sadi Carnot, and alleged wheel-warring by Physchim62. As a result of the case, Sadi Carnot was banned for one year, and the other parties encouraged to "move forward from this unfortunate incident with a spirit of mutual understanding and forgiveness".
• Stefanomencarelli: A case involving alleged copyright violations by Stefanomencarelli, for which he was banned from the Italian Wikipedia. Problems are also caused by Stefanomencarelli's lack of fluency in English. Stefanomencarelli denies the allegations. As a result of the case, Stefanomencarelli was banned for one year.

• Macedonia: A case involving a dispute between editors from Greece and from the Republic of Macedonia over the use of "Macedonia" in Wikipedia.

• Eyrian: A case involving checkuser-confirmed sockpuppetry by admin Eyrian.
• Asgardian-Tenebrae: A case involving conflict between Asgardian and Tenebrae.

• Ferrylodge: A case involving a community ban of Ferrylodge on the now-defunct Community sanction noticeboard, but which User:B has, in accordance with Wikipedia:Community ban, stated that he is willing to overturn. Kirill Lokshin has proposed remedies, generally with the support of four arbitrators, disapproving the ban, but restricting Ferrylodge's editing and instructing him not to interact with Bishonen or KillerChihuahua.

• Railpage Australia: A case involving alleged disruptive editing and sockpuppetry on Railpage Australia. If closed, Tezza1 would be banned for one year.
• Martinphi-ScienceApologist: A case involving alleged POV-pushing and incivility on pseudoscience-related articles. If closed, the editing of Martinphi and ScienceApologist would be restricted, and ScienceApologist limited to one account.