And other new findings

A systematic approach.

When notability conflicts with what it might be used for.

Wading into several controversies.

Over 1,700 U.S. congressmen owned slaves. You can help document this.

Even for Wikipedia critics in nappies!

Beam me up, Scotty – Matt Amodio for sure, and maybe just a few VIPs, billionaires, and Tucker Carlson.

We just look at the pictures!

And other recent research publications

Bias, propaganda and more murderous mistakes!

Summaries of 26 new research publications

Will he hang it in the Oval Office?

Explicit behavioral expectations are better than unwritten social norms

You can!

Wikidata, Turkey, Valentine's Day and all sorts of bias!

A new "wiki journalism" is needed.

Edit wars fought on the back of workers.

And other new research publications

Wikipedia deprecates more right-wing sources than left-wing sources ... but is it a problem?

Male is not the default.

Ortega's hypothesis was right! (If you start with the right definitions and assumptions.)

Straight down the tubes.

Community harnesses new technologies for remote participation in events and gatherings

Worth Every Goddamn Second!

And other new research results.

Plus the importance of language.

What we know we don't know, and why it might matter more than you might think

Can Wikipedia mobilize the same energy to fill other gaps in coverage?

That particular artists would be omitted through oversight or happenstance is reasonable, but that one of the world's leading publishers of art books is completely unaware of their major omissions is startling.

A monthly roundup of Wikimedia-related research

CSCW '14 retrospective; the impact of SOPA on deletionism: The monthly roundup of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, edited jointly with the Wikimedia Research Committee.

WikiProject Countering System Bias aims to combat imbalanced coverage while encouraging neglected cultural perspectives and points of view, both in articles and in the larger Wikipedia community. As you'll see from the varied experiences and motivations of our nine respondents, the biases that the folks at WP CSB tackle run the full gamut of human characteristics and dispositions. The interview that follows unveils many of Wikipedia's greatest shortcomings.

An ArXiv preprint titled "Highlighting entanglement of cultures via ranking of multilingual Wikipedia articles" is about the Wikipedia articles on individuals and their position in the hyperlink network of the articles in each Wikipedia language edition, considering the whole hyperlink network.

Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more: A report on an online service which was created to conduct real-time monitoring of Wikipedia articles of companies, and more.

A monthly overview of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, edited jointly with the Wikimedia Research Committee and republished as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter.