 Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
| ||||
Larry Sanger, known to many as the co-founder of Wikipedia, was the "chief organizer" of Wikipedia starting in January 2001, when Wikipedia first published, until February 2002, when Jimmy Wales decided that the encyclopedia could no longer afford his services. Despite his limited editing since then (about 1,780 edits), Sanger has remained a person of interest to Wikipedians, at least until his indefinite banning on June 23, 2026 for canvassing.
The Signpost has reported on Sanger’s writings and activities since January 10, 2005, our very first issue, after Sanger published a criticism of Wikipedia’s purported anti-elitism off-Wiki and inspired a round of debate about Wikipedia's credibility in the press. This article follows Sanger's Wiki-career as documented in The Signpost from that time until early this year. There are about 182 Signpost articles that mention Sanger. We'll concentrate on about forty of them. For the current news on Sanger's block see [[]].
Three weeks after the first Signpost coverage of Sanger, he appeared again as one of several Wikipedia critics in an article on the encyclopedia’s credibility.
The article The Sanger memoirs appeared on April 25, 2005 and should be of interest to anybody interested in the minutiae of the founding of Nupedia and Wikipedia. It appeared soon after Sanger published a 14,620 word Memoirs off-Wiki [1] (more accessible preprints available at [2] and [3])
In 1999, Jimmy Wales wanted to start a free, collaborative encyclopedia.
To my great surprise, Jimmy replied to my e-mail describing his idea of a free encyclopedia, and asking if I might be interested in leading the project. He was specifically interested in finding a philosopher to lead the project, he said. He made it a condition of my employment [at Nupedia] that I would finish my Ph.D. quickly (whereupon I would get a raise)--which I did, in June 2000. I am still grateful for the extra incentive. I thought he would be a great boss, and indeed he was.
To be clear, the idea of an open source, collaborative encyclopedia, open to contribution by ordinary people, was entirely Jimmy’s, not mine, and the funding was entirely by Bomis. I was merely a grateful employee; I thought I was very lucky to have a job like that land in my lap. Of course, other people had had the idea; but it was Jimmy's fantastic foresight actually to invest in it. For this the world owes him a considerable debt. The actual development of this encyclopedia was the task he gave me to work on.
Any inconsistency between being "merely a grateful employee" and being a "co-founder" — a word he used twice in the Memoirs — was not mentioned by Sanger.
Sanger commented at great length on many Nupedia and Wikipedia topics, preferring the management style and culture of Nupedia to that of Wikipedia. He refused the title of editor-in-chief at Wikipedia, despite keeping that title at Nupedia until he was laid off. His title at Wikipedia was "chief organizer," which he performed by soliciting Nupedians and others to edit the new wiki, suggesting rules for Wikipedians to follow, and similar duties.
Sanger's new ideas for online encyclopedias continued through 2006-2010. An article in The Guardian about the Digital Universe, another encyclopedia website inspired by Sanger's work, appeared in July 2006.
A week later The New Yorker ran a long piece on Wikipedia, how its rules and admin corps had quickly grown, and describing the views of Encyclopædia Britannica president Jorge Cauz.
A few weeks later we reported that Marshall Poe in The Atlantic Monthly took a deep dive into the early history of Wikipedia. Poe appears to have read Sanger's Memoirs in detail and concluded that "Wales's part in [the founding of Wikipedia] was clear; he owned Wikipedia. Sanger's role was murkier."
In September 2006 Citizendium, another Wiki alternative, was announced. A Signpost reader commented that Sanger has "been trying different ideas based on this for a while, all fail because of no editing in them…. Funding problem perhaps."
A week later we reviewed the media's early reactions to Citizendium.
"Sanger said he was pleased that Wikipedia was accepting of his new project. 'We will take the best of their articles and edit them and hopefully make them better,' he said. 'And they are free to take from our articles. We're in a partnership to a certain extent, two parallel-thinking projects.'"
— San Diego Union-Tribune
By April 2007, Citizendium still hadn’t fully opened.
Later that April a passing mention raised the heat, as Sanger mentioned that Wikipedia governance was "beyond repair".
By February 2008, the gloves were off. Sanger, while promoting Citizendium at Eastern Michigan University, according to the Detroit Free Press said "I sort of separated myself from that organization and that crowd…We can actually do better."
On April 8, 2009 Sanger posted an "Open letter to Wales" at User talk:Jimbo Wales and republished it in the Citizendium blog, among other venues. It’s a long, impassioned call to right a great wrong, demanding that Wales admit that Sanger was a co-founder of Wikipedia and that the Wikimedia Foundation officially endorse Sanger's claim.
The Signpost followed up and quoted Wales's reply to Sanger, "As I have said many times, I think the entire 'controversy' is silly....Larry didn't make Wikipedia, and neither did I. It was made by the community, and lots of people played interesting roles. If other people feel a burning need to discuss this, please do so elsewhere other than my talk page; I'm not interested in discussing it at this time."
In October 2009 the "Sanger controversy reignited," according to the Signpost headline. This reporter cannot find any archives of the off-Wiki articles referenced, so we just use the quotations from the Signpost article.
Jason Calacanis and Sanger alleged that Jimbo Wales has downplayed Sanger's role on Wikipedia for financial motives. Calacanis, in an interview then on YouTube, stated:
In another forum Sanger stated:
A very serious Sanger allegation about child pornography was covered by the Signpost in 2010. Sanger reported this allegation to the FBI and to his congressional representatives. He got a serious, if controversial, reaction from Jimmy Wales, the WMF, and the community as shown the next month in the Signpost.
In October 2014, in The story of Wikipedia, the Signpost reviewed extracts from the book The Innovators, Walter Isaacson's then-new book, which gives a sympathetic view of the two co-founders’ narrative, supporting Sanger's view. Isaacson's view gains further support since he was an early Wikipedian.
Isaacson "waxes enthusiastic about Wikipedia's mechanisms of collaboration and consensus as it applies to both the development of articles and the governance of the project. He particularly stresses the principle of neutral point of view in producing articles," according to the Signpost.
In December 2014 Sanger launches a "Wikipedia for news" on the Infobitt launch, citing Newsweek. Unfortunately Infobitt ran out of money by July 2015, as reported by the Signpost.
In November 2015 Sanger was interviewed by Vice about how Wikipedia started. One problem according to Sanger was that "trolls sort of took over. The inmates started running the asylum." The Independent reprinted much of the interview with its own interpretation. Sanger said "they got the thrust of the interview wrong."
In December 2017 Sanger joined Everipedia as CIO, promising to put that encyclopedia on the blockchain and give editors tokens that would give them a financial reward for their editing. A dozen other Signpost articles mentioned Everipedia, but Sanger resigned in 2019 and returned his digital wooden nickels after contributing an article to it about his left thumb.
Also in 2019, Sanger introduced his new encyclopedia project, the Encyclosphere, writing that "Wikipedia has become an arrogant and controlling oligarchy."
An interesting podcast was mentioned in In the media in 2021. It questions Sanger's co-founding role, but examines both sides in excruciating detail over 45 minutes. The Signpost article's comments page gives a more Sanger-friendly interpretation.
Sanger gave up criticizing Wikipedia in 2013, according to one of his twitter posts at the time, but his political criticism of Wikipedia was just taking off in 2020, according to a long series of Signpost items in our In the media column. In Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-05-31/In the media § CBS on COVID-19, Sanger on bias, false noses, and five prolific editors (May 2020), we recorded the comments he made on Fox News about Wikipedia's bias and lefty politics.
In November 2020 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-11-01/In the media § The Christian Post, Sanger and the Breitbart newsletter shared a complaint about userboxes being removed on Wikipedia when they read "This user believes that marriage is the union between one man and one woman."
In February 2021 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-02-28/In the media § Larry Sanger, Fox News, The Daily Mail, and The Washington Times take on Wikipedia's bias Fox News covered a Sanger blogpost decrying Wikipedia's purported lack of a neutrality policy. Sanger apparently means that Wikipedia's policy is the opposite of his own views on neutrality. For example, he writes "Wikipedia frequently asserts, in its own voice, that many of Trump's statements are 'false.' Well, perhaps they are. But even if they are, it is not exactly neutral for an encyclopedia article to say so, especially without attribution."
More bias accusations emerged in July 2021, this time called "propaganda". Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-07-25/In the media § Larry Sanger on bias in Wikipedia – with opinion orthodoxy, truth becomes more elusive was described somewhat differently by Fox News, The Independent and by The National Review.
See also October 2021 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-10-31/In the media § Don't bite the newbies.
In 2022 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2022-04-24/In the media § In brief Sanger was interviewed by Tucker Carlson on Fox News complaining about "the left's 'relentless' takeover of mass media and Wikipedia" and emphasizing his own dedication to neutrality.
In 2023 Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2023-01-16/In the media § Court orders user data in libel case, Saudi Wikipedia in the crosshairs, Larry Sanger at it again Sanger is quoted as saying "If you want to participate in the world's largest encyclopedia [Wikipedia], you must collaborate with a shadowy group of anonymous amateurs and paid shills on exactly one article per topic." The article then goes on to describe Sanger's increasingly complicated Encyclosphere.
2025 was the climax in Sanger's political commentary, with at least seven Signpost articles mentioning him.
Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-03-22/In the media § Larry, Elon, and Don; or, will Wikipedia get its very own Executive Order? Sanger explains in a Fox News video why he asked Elon Musk to investigate whether US Federal employees are being paid to edit Wikipedia and help stop it. He continues by asking US President Donald Trump to prohibit such activities.
In an hour-long YouTube interview with James Poulos on Blaze TV, covered by the Signpost Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-04-09/In the media § In brief "Wikipedia scandal exposed: Big Tech manipulates what you see", Sanger calls Wikipedia "rank propaganda" and "the mouthpiece of the Establishment".
In May Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-05-01/In the media § Trump-nominated prosecutor targets WMF's tax status Sanger's statements against Wikipedia were used to justify the then-interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin to investigate the Wikimedia Foundation's non-profit tax status. (Neither the investigation nor Ed Martin went very far after the original announcement.)
By September Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-09-09/In the media § US Congress probes Wikipedia Sanger stated "I am glad that Congress is investigating the use of foreign and U.S. government funds to pay for biased editing on Wikipedia."
The following three articles tell similar stories:
The blocking of Sanger in June 2026 is a different kind of story than this deep dive into the Signpost's archives, but two mentions of Sanger in the 2026 Signpost conveniently set the stage for Sanger's apparent last act on Wikipedia.
A Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2026-03-10/In the media § video from Reason shows separate interviews with Wales, Sanger, and others, skillfully spliced so that it almost looks like they are debating one another. While this video might be taken as a slanted summary of Sanger's wiki-career as it was viewed in early 2026, a more conventional text piece from India's The Economic Times repeats the now common co-editor story, taking us back to the start of Sanger's career.
Discuss this story