Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams

This week by the numbers; edits and page views.

Two cases remain open, Abortion and Senkaku Islands; the second is very close to finished.

Last call for comments on candidates for appointment to the CheckUser and Oversight teams

The Arbitration Committee is still seeking comments from the community regarding the candidates presented for appointment to the CheckUser and Oversight teams (see previous Signpost coverage). Comments concerning the suitability or unsuitability of the individual candidates may be made publicly or submitted privately via email to the committee until 23:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC). It is expected that by October 10 appointments will be announced from the list of approved candidates:

← Previous "Arbitration report"

Next "Arbitration report" →

In this issue

3 October 2011 (all comments)

News and notes

In the news

WikiProject report

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

Was it really necessary for the invitation to comment on CU/OS candidates to completely replace the reports about ongoing arbitration cases? Guy Macon (talk) 04:27, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say it replaced the reports, that would mean the reports were there in the first place. I think understaffing may be a concern here. –xeno^talk 12:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Pages in the Arbitration Family"

I'm not entirely certain what this graph is intended to represent. I note, also, that it appears to only include pages of current cases, and does not include amendment requests, clarification requests, noticeboards, talk pages of noticeboards or other committee-related pages, anything to do with the AUSC, any other committee-related subpages (including the current CU/OS candidate pages). If that could be added in, it might give a picture that is a bit more realistic for people who are attempting to assess the amount of discussion related to the Arbitration Committee. Risker (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edits graph is for all arbcom activity (Special:RecentChangesLinked/User:Jorgenev/arbcomwatchlist). "Pages in the Arbitration Family" meaning all arbitration pages of any type. You are right though that I am missing the edits from the elections, I forgot about them and so I didn't think the watchlist needed updating this week. I only tabulate page views for cases because pages like the amendment requests or enforcement requests are transcluded onto a single page and so that individual page data is lost. JORGENEV 09:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]