Proposed decision submitted for one case

The Arbitration Committee opened no new cases this week. Two cases are currently open.

See previous Signpost coverage for background and the specific scope of this case. During the week, several editors submitted on-wiki evidence.

See earlier Signpost coverage for background. During the week, drafter Kirill Lokshin submitted a proposed decision for arbitrators to vote on, including 5 principles, 5 findings of fact, and 4 remedies. In total, rulings concerning three editors and one administrator are being considered.

← Previous "Arbitration report"

Next "Arbitration report" →

In this issue

1 August 2011 (all comments)

News and notes

In the news

Research interview

WikiProject report

Featured content

Arbitration report

Technology report

+ Add a comment

Discuss this story

These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.

How can a week two case link back to June in August?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the link.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It may be worth mentioning that MMN just recently went on a rampage and was indef blocked in response. Critics have stated that the rampage could have been avoided if this case was closed sooner (since MMN would have gotten blocked when the case closed and since all the votes needed to end the case were apparently already in). Sven Manguard Wha? 19:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]